Mongolian officials “have the obligation” to arrest Vladimir Putin if he visits the country next week, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has said.

The trip, expected to happen on Tuesday, will be the first time the Russian leader has visited an ICC member nation since the court ordered his arrest in March 2023.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Mongolia doesnt share a border with two belligerent superpowers. Two belligerent superpowers share a border with Mongolia.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Superpowers? China and what else? You mean the country up north that can’t finish their 3 day operation in Ukraine has no economical or geopolitical significance and no one put them in corner only because they have nukes?

    • Antmz22@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      149
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      China is so belligerent they are literally always at war and funding war/regime change abroad…wait…thats not right at all, that’s the US I’m thinking of.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        106
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Good job pushing irrelevant pro-CCP propaganda into an article and comment section that had literally nothing to do with “America bad”

        • MaDMaX99@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          47
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s CPC, only the American propaganda media call it ccp for obvious reasons (they’re still obsessed with the Soviets (CCCP)) lol 😂

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Ackchually it’s 中国共产党

            The translation could go either way, which is why it was both CCP and CPC before CPC was the officially commented version. The old one has just stuck around since it’s a grammatically equivalent moniker, and nobody really cares. It’s not even disrespectful.

            • MaDMaX99@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              As I said before only the American fascism and it’s propaganda apparatus call it that way

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Well, yes, it is the common term used in america. I believe I covered the quirk of transliteration that lead to it’s use. Ergo, american-english affiliated media will likely use the term used in america. Other media will, obviously, use the transliteration common to their culture.

          • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            If your best argument counter is “haha yu put letters in the wrong order!!1”, you seriously need to work on your material better. That’s just low effort, man.

        • Antmz22@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          70
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m pretty sure they were actually the ones pushing irrelevant state department propaganda about “China bad” in the comment section of an article about Russia meeting with Mongolia.

          You just approve of the China bad propaganda.

          • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            65
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            My guy, the top level comment was making a joke about Genghis Khan/Mongolia’s history, and the article doesnt even mention China. You’re the one who magically interpreted it with zero basis as an attack on Dear Leader’s sensibilities.
            If your allegiance were any more transparent, you’d be a piece of glass. Please find your brain sometime soon, it misses you. This thread is over and my block list grows by one!

            • Antmz22@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              50
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              My guy, the top level comment was making a joke about Genghis Khan/Mongolia’s history, and the article doesnt even mention China

              “My guy”, the comment said

              Mongolia doesnt share a border with two belligerent superpowers. Two belligerent superpowers share a border with Mongolia.

              Mongolia shares a border with 2 countries. Russia and China. Exactly, the article doesn’t say anything about China. The top level comment jumps in to call them a belligerent superpower out of nowhere.

              You’re the one who magically interpreted it with zero basis as an attack on Dear Leader’s sensibilities.

              So who are the two countries that Mongolia shares a border with in your world? Russia and who if not China?

              If your allegiance were any more transparent, you’d be a piece of glass. Please find your brain sometime soon, it misses you.

              Funny how you type always project so hard.

              • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                32
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Dude… what? China is very much a belligerent superpower. Your whataboutism abt the US has literally nothing to do with the topic of discussion as it has no bearing on this geopolitical situation, whereas China DIRECTLY NEIGHBORS the nation in question, is routinely aggresive towards western-allied nations like the Phillipines (or momgolia), and tends to side with Russia over western institutions. Are you being purposely obtuse, or are you just that dense?

            • MaDMaX99@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Your ignorance just told me you must be American lol 🤣 communism = far LEFT ideology whereas fascism = far RIGHT ideology so they’re basically OPPOSITE ideologies!!! You American ppl are hilarious, please keep entertaining us lol 😂😂😂

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Both mindsets are social cancers supporting colonialism and autocrats.

            Two things can be true/bad at once.

            Be better

        • Antmz22@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          59
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, it wasn’t whataboutism, it was blatant denial of the premise and stating that it’s actually projection from the real #1 global belligerent.

          China is not at war with the Philippines, there are contested waters. Yet Everytime there is a minor dispute, America paints it as a massive deal and wants to use it as an excuse to send their military to the region…

          What war is China actively involved in?

          What genocide is China currently partaking in?

          If China is one of the less belligerent countries in the world, it’s not whataboutism to point out the other countries to oppose the narrative that China is the belligerent one.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            What genocide is China currently partaking in?

            If you are going to attempt to spread misinformation about the Uyghur Genocide not being a genocide, I’m going to tell you right now as a moderator to not start with that.

          • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why hasn’t West Taiwan gone to war over Taiwan and the South China Sea? Because they are a Paper Tiger and know they would be embarrassed by the US Navy. That’s why the US shows up to every “minor dispute”, to keep the peace and support their allies. Additionally, China has recently been extremely belligerent concerning the border with India, which is a continuation of what has been happening since the 1960’s.

            Historically, you’ve also forgotten the CCPs military actions against Tibet, Vietnam, Cambodia, South Korea, and the many border conflicts with Russia/USSR.

            As for genocides, it is very convenient for you to forget about the Uyghurs…

        • Antmz22@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because it’s objectively false that China is always at war and doing regime change.

          They’re one of the least belligerent superpowers around.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Well they’re both bad and the world would be better off without those countries which have a high percentage of people liking authoritarian leaders.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Uh-oh, sounds like it’s time for another Yuan dynasty!

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Folks who clapped like seals at the formation of NAFTA and the EU are forever mad and extremely nationalist the moment Ulaanbaatar and Beijing start engaging in a little cross-border economic development. The Mongolian Central Corridor has the opportunity to dramatically improve the livelihoods of millions of people, and the western response is to bankroll domestic terrorists to blow that shit up.

        Of course, these are the same idiots and assholes who staunchly defend a 9/11 every day in the Gaza strip. The Online American is far and away the most propagandized creature on earth.