Binance was slapped with a $4.3 billion fine because it let groups like Hamas and ISIS receive funds: Treasury Department::“Can barely buy an AK-47 with 600 bucks,” a Binance compliance staffer told his boss in 2019, per regulators.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    There’s just no way the US dollar could ever possibly be used that way. 🙄

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    How do those companies pay these gigantic fine? $4 billion wire transfer? Does the bank even allow wiring that huge amount of money? Monthly Installment? Trucks carrying palettes of money?

    • stifle867@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The balance is kept at a bank and the banks have ledgers with the reserve bank who in turn adds $40B to the asset column and negates $40B from the liabilities column. That’s the basic version. Nothing changes hands per se. It’s just 1s and 0s on a computer.

          • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Fraudsters HATE this one old-timey computer language

            Edit: for real tho, can learning COBOL easily translate into some bank or bank-adjacent role even if they don’t have a CS degree or whatever?

            • stifle867@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ve heard 2nd stories of the few old-timers who still know COBAL, FORTRAN, etc who have very generous salaries working in sectors like banking. It’s probably too late now though.

              • theherk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Isn’t too late. Work in a very large bank. Some of the COBOL underpinnings will probably never die. The same cannot be said for their maintainers.

            • hamptonio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              You’re probably better off learning java at this point, its the future equivalent of COBOL for banking.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        My bank only allows like $2 million dollars online wire transfer per day on their corporate account. Transferring billions would probably requires you to meet with your bank’s account manager?

        • stifle867@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I’m unsure if the details of that process are public but presumably it is possible through coordination with the bank, the treasury department, or both. What I could find publicly was that CZ’s personal fine of $70m is payable either by ETF, cashier’s check or money order.

          EDIT: This rabbit hole also led me to find out that this year, British American Tobacco has a $500m fine for violating some Weapons of Mass Destruction regulation. It sounds horrifying but they basically sold equipment to make cigarettes to the DPRK and tried to hide it. It’s confronting seeing proof how blatantly corporations act. There was actual people who decided to do this.

        • veroxii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m guessing if you have to pay the government, you can get government approval.

  • Salamendacious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the cofounder of Binance and a central figure in the crypto world, is also stepping down as CEO under the settlement.

    Zhao is pleading guilty to breaking anti money-laundering law, per the justice department. Zhao will personally pay $50 million in fines, and faces up to 18 months in prison,

    Man I feel like he’s getting off light honestly and I saw there are more charges from the SEC but how is he the only one facing time?

    • Mercival@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I love how just a year ago, he was the one to call out FTX.

      People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones and all that…

      The whole industry seems like a criminal plot at this point.

      • sv1sjp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Binance has no problem with its clients. FTX literally invested the money of the people in high risk assets, and they ended up bankrupted.

        In the day of the Binance’s trial, people withdraw more than billion of dollars worth Cryptos. Binance didn’t end up bankrupt as they are holding A LOT.

        • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Centralization allows for this. If people exchanged crypto peer to peer transaction amounts would be much smaller and no one person or company would have nearly as big of a share as binance. So I will continue to say not your keys, not your coins.

          • sv1sjp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            If you are trading, its a cheaper choice. (Except if you are trading in Blockchains like polygon) Also, “not your keys not your coins”, but most people are losing access to their Facebook account (without 2FA), they have no chance to keep their own keys…

            • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              People need to learn to take responsibility. If they lose their money once or twice, they won’t do it again, because they will figure out exactly how to not lose their money. Losing access to a Facebook account is inconvenient because you have to do the whole forgot password thing, but losing access to your money and knowing there’s no way to get it back is a whole different story.

              • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I feel like you don’t get duality of outcomes is for the poors. Rich people get their nut and they get it back. Always. I’ve read somewhere its like Rule #0 or #1 🤔

                • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  If a rich person is using crypto the way it is meant to be used with holding their own keys, then they don’t get their money back either if they lose their keys. Literally, it’s not your keys, not your coins. If they don’t have the key, they don’t have the coins no matter who they are.

        • JamesNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          We only know ftx was stealing due to a run on the exchange. Binance could also easily be in the same boat, we just don’t know, as they have not been tested for there liquidity. Also it turns out ftx pretty much had the money, but it just was not liquid.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        FTX was a scam, they literally stole from their clients. The only failure of Binance is they failed to reject certain clients certain governments asked them to reject

      • yiliu@informis.land
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        FTX stole from customers. Binance didn’t sufficiently spy on its customers. They are not the same.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    The US government pretending that they aren’t going to make money as a result of this…

  • geogle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    I first read Beyonce, and I was both confused and impressed by her troublemaking and net worth

  • stifle867@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    They should use a portion of these funds to setup specific task forces to dig deeper into the company and provide oversight indefinitely. $4.3B is a lot of money, you could fund an agency forever and still have change.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      laughs in less than two weeks of pentagon funding

      For what it’s worth I agree with you, but the money we spend on many agencies is wild

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Haha yes, the Pentagon has probably “lost” more money than the totality of all fines.

        It’s just an idea I had, rather than directly spending out of a budget it would be a way to be self sustaining. If there is no wrongdoing then by its nature the funding would dry up and be self-cancelling. On the other hand it could generate further revenue if allowed to continue investigating.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The problem is that the auditors will ALWAYS find wrongdoing, even if it doesn’t exist. If their funding (and therefore their jobs) depend on fines on offending organizations, then everyone is getting found to be fraudulent

          • stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s definitely a real problem that would need to be considered. I’m sure it has been in great length. My gut feeling says it’s workable though and the problem being more political than technical.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m in full agreement. Crypto was touted as this “untraceable currency” and, surprise, it became used for nefarious means. We need more regulation on this stuff, not less, because as much as the “everyday joe” who got into crypto “because his nephew taught him about it” doesn’t want the government spying on him, really it’s massive fund transfers and money laundering for bad actors that it seems to benefit the most.

          • stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Especially once you’ve been found or pleaded guilty. If a person commits a crime of this magnitude and they go to jail, they would have probation upon release. Maybe there should be some kind of corporate probation policy? Not something up for negotiation.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Implying they do this for truth and justice. US just doesn’t want anyone to eat their cake.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      4.3B doesn’t last as long as you think, especially once you need to staff 100’s of people, the equipment and tech they need to work, office building(s) for them. Especially if you put that office and staff on either coast. They’ll burn that in 3 years tops

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Would they need all those resources dedicated to just one company? I feel like they wouldn’t have spent anywhere near $4.3B. Considering the investigation was started in 2021 so let’s say 2 years or $3B. It seems extremely unlikely and even more than 1 order of magnitude off.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Binance on Tuesday reached a settlement with US regulators — including the justice and treasury departments — to pay $4.3 billion in fines for violating anti-money laundering and sanctions laws.

    The treasury department said Binance failed to report over 100,000 suspicious transactions involving terrorist groups, ransomware, child sexual exploitation material, and scams.

    The Hamas transactions were acknowledged in February 2019 by Binance’s chief compliance officer at the time, Samuel Lim, according to a Commodity Futures Trading Commission lawsuit filed in March against the crypto exchange.

    On top of Tuesday’s settlement, which also resolves the March CFTC complaint, Zhao is pleading guilty to breaking anti money-laundering law, per the justice department.

    “Binance grew at an extremely fast pace globally, in a new and evolving industry that was in the early stages of regulation, and Binanace made misguided decisions along the way,” the blog said.

    Yesha Yadav, a law professor at Vanderbilt University, told Reuters that the deal “looks designed to give Binance the chance to live another day, while removing CZ, a figurehead who has been so intrinsically linked to the growth of a business model.”


    The original article contains 551 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • swearengen@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I traded on Binance back when they let anyone on. It was wild you could just deposit your crypto and go nuts. No docs needed and limits were very high before any type of verification kicked in so I’m not surprised it was abused.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I don’t get it how people are so keen on sacrificing their freedoms for boogeymen. Surely there are other ways to prevent money laundering without fucking up the whole user experience and literally locking out big chunk of population because their missing a minor KYC detail.