• HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This. Ignoring the questionable source.

    Other than denying Kerch bridge has anything to do with the UK. And they have provided 0 evidence to indicate it was.

    Nothing they claim in any way disagrees with the UK open policy on Ukraine. Even if the UK blow Kerch bridge. It would be seen as supporting Ukraine’s own desire to keep their territory. Rather than anyway, proving that Ukraine would want to surrender without the UK “Plotting to keep them fighting”

    Nothing here at all disagrees with the goals openly declared by the UK government. Under both current and previose leadership.