• Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The presented evidence doesn’t uphold the claims in the article. The site is a propaganda rag

    • zante@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Are you saying it’s an elaborate fake ?

      There a lots of photos of the documents they referenced.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        No, I’m saying the documents do not sustain the claims. The documents go into supporting Ukraine, e.g. to help them defeat Russian fleet and gain maritime supremacy. However, there’s no indication on what I’ve seen there akin to the claims that they want to “drag out the war as long as possible” and “prepare their own people to live in poverty” (not exact quotes because I’m on phone and I’m afraid to lose this text). These are the authors one-sided and tendentious interpretations of continued support, which by the structure of the article and the way he presents it he makes seem as if they were part of the documents. But they aren’t.

        UK supports Ukraine. That’s a known fact. It’d be insane to believe there’d be no briefings on strategy (whether these came into effect isn’t clear either).