• Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because he’s doing everything to make it fail and destroy the platform, isn’t it obvious?

    • notapantsday@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t know. The way it’s going down, it really makes him look like an idiot. He could have just flipped the switch and turned it off as a massive demonstration of power.

      Instead he’s making one mindboggingly stupid decision after another, showing the whole world how utterly incompetent he is.

      The most logical explanation for me is the easiest one: if he’s making stupid and incompetent decisions, maybe he’s just stupid and incompetent.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re saying the guy that has done nothing but look like a total fool for years could actually be a total fool? By the gods, I think you’re onto something!

    • chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      People told me I was crazy when I said he bought it to shut it down. Look who he hangs out with, people with a fuckton of money who hate free speech. Very powerful people who control media empires and run oppressive regimes.

      He might be stupid, but the people pulling his strings aren’t.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Like others have said, bullshit. He’ll drive it into the ground and pretend that was his plan the whole time, like he’s some undercover genius three steps ahead of everyone, when really he’s just constantly playing catch-up with his narcissistic outbursts.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s like saying “my car may fail after I poured sand into the gas tank and replaced the electrical with speaker wires”

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because he’s doing everything to make it fail and destroy the platform, isn’t it obvious?

      It is tremendously obvious, I agree. At one point it felt kinda hyperbolic to say, but not for awhile now.

      I’m not knowledgeable enough to be able to speculate what’s in it for him, but it’s 100% obvious that’s what’s being done.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        He might call him self pro free speech, but he actually hates it (as long as it’s not his own free speech). Getting rid of Twitter is a massive blow to free speech. One less platform where he and his companies can get outed and criticized on.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Twitter was becoming another walled platform (not being able to read the content without being logged in) even before Musk’s take-over.

          I’m happy for any walled platform to fail. IMO they have no place on internet.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s less nefarious than that. He wants to be a championed business leader. He’s just a fuck up who was forced to buy a platform that he never actually intended to buy (except for maybe a couple of days when he first suggested it). Sure, it will help his side when he runs it into the ground, but that’s not his intent despite being the cause.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, you don’t throw away $44 billion just for shit and giggles, not even if you are as rich as Musk. Musk is (probably) a narcissist who thought he could make it work in his delusional mind.

      He wanted a mouthpiece for the MAGA crowd, and he probably thought the desire in the population for it, would make it succeed, if he made the platform embrace that. He probably envisioned himself as a great liberator, who would be celebrated for bringing free speech back to America.

      Musk has been losing it for a long time, and it seems to only get worse.

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I keep thinking there must be some high level plan here to destroy twitter for the good of humanity. I mean it’s that or Elon actually just is that stupid. At this point the latter seems the most likely …

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        What if Elon was encouraged to buy twitter by people who knew he would fuck it up in short order for them?

        If you want to take down a corporation, there’s two main ways right now. Have Elon take charge, or have Ken Griffin short them into the cellar.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        What about Elon Musk makes you think he’d do anything for the good of humanity?

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That was my original thought when he came on and immediately fired 75% of the staff. It’s not some savvy slimming down or cost-cutting. It was more like a wrecking ball.

      It was fairly clear that his overall desire was the make the platform less useful for liberals and more for conservatives. It seems like he is content to destroy it if he can’t achieve the latter.