Tesla Under Investigation After Fatal Crash May Have Involved Autopilot System, Report Says::undefined

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a fan of Tesla or Musk, but I think it always bears repeating in these conversations that AI driving will be much safer than human driving if it isn’t already.

    Unfortunately, accidents will happen, but when an accident happens with an AI, ALL the other AI’s get to learn from that failure going forward.

    I’m very happy that in my old age, I’ll have some future version of this driving me around… or more likely, taking the wheel from me if I do something stupid.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI driving is only as good as it’s sensors.

      While most other companies use LIDAR, Musk switched to video cameras because it’s cheaper.

      Which is why Tesla “FSD” is worse than competitors.

    • eksb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      “This thing that does not exist and nobody has any idea how to make it” will totally be safer than human driving.

      You know what is safer than human driving and we know how to make? Trains.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m still waiting for my train from LA to SF. It’s been in the works since I was in college. I’ve already graduated, had multiple jobs, early retired, and there’s still no sign of it.

      • flossdaily@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry, but that’s just silly.

        Plenty of people have great ideas on how to make self-driving cars, and we’re seeing them come into play.

        If you don’t understand that computer reaction time is ludicrously faster than human reaction time, and what that means for safety, I really can’t help you, though.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We all understand the benefits of computer reaction time, computer-assisted safety features are being included in cars all over the world.

          But those are “stop” features, that make the car refrain from doing something harmful. The problem are the “go” features, that give a car decision power.

          We tend to forget about all the lives saved by the “stop” features and focus on one life lost through a “go” feature. It may be a shortcoming of human nature but we are what we are and this is why “go” features don’t have a future.

    • atp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Autopilot is terrible and the fact that they advertise it as a reputable system is abhorrent. And yes, I own a tesla.

      • navi@lemmy.tespia.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty happy with autopilot in our cars, especially on road trips. It really helps with driving fatigue.

    • silvercove@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI driving will probably be safer one day, but there is no real data today that demonstrates its current state is. At the same time we’re getting lots of examples where it fails at the most basic stuff.