• macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    SDUC supports up to one hundred and twenty eight Terabytes O.o

    Who in the world requires so much Storage on a tiny SD card?!

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s a lot of games/applications then, is the card reader fast enough though?

        • paddirn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I use mine exclusively for emulation and ROMs, entire libraries of every single game released for older systems. The SD card I have for that runs them fine without issue. Potentially with newer/bigger games you might come across issues, that I haven’t really done at all.

        • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ve been using a 1tb sd card with mine and my steam library. Not any noticeable difference in speed between the internal ssd and micro sd.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Luckily there is a m.2 slot in the deck 😉

        And in general as well, does it make more sense to use m.2 Type-2230 SSD instead of SD cards, these days. Way faster and way more robust.

        • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          As someone who did swap theor steam deck’s M.2, I really wish it were a 2280 instead since those drives can hold much more. The largest 2230 I could find was only 2 TB.

        • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not really super feasible for the average user to crack apart the plastic casing and reformat the new m.2 slot (since there is only one) with a new SteamOS partition.

          I think you’ll find 95% of all steam deck users will prefer popping in a microsd than ripping apart their deck and formatting/transferring in a new internal drive.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s not too hard. Make a direct copy of the old drive to an external drive. Install the new drive. Do a direct copy back onto the new drive from the external. Expand the partition to the new size.

            Or you can install the new drive and reinstall steam os.

            • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              For you and me no it’s not too hard at all. But you and I aren’t the average consumer. The average consumer buys it and uses it like a console. To the average consumer, this is impossible. Very few people are going to open it up and conduct what they would consider computer surgery.

      • palordrolap@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        “I’ve said some stupid things and some wrong things, but not that." – an actual Bill Gates quote referring to the 640k quote that won’t die.

        But yes, it was probably satirically ascribed to him because of MS-DOS not having the capability to deal with any more than that amount of RAM for a lot longer than it probably should have.

        The “temporary” solution of requiring an extra driver to be able to do so (EMM386.SYS or similar) remained in place right up until DOS-based Windows was allowed to die.

        (The underlying reason was almost certainly ancient IBM PC memory-mapped IO standards, so maybe we could ascribe the original quote an engineer working there some time around 1980.)

    • Zier@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      I want all my music on my phone, not just a pithy 80,000 songs.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        As a bandcamp flac lover, I concur. I’ve spent so much supporting small artists it’s actually insane. I make two copies after I download an album: one to giant memory stick which I can plug into entertainment systems and such, one to the microsd in my phone. I currently have 1TB microsd in my phone for this reason, but I can see it possibly running out one day :D

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      We say that about every tech capacity. No way anyone could ever use more than 1.44mb, oh man 2mb ram will be all I ever need etc.

    • sugartits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Look, some people may have a porn collection that they need to backup and store “about their person” and this is the ideal way to do that.

      Don’t be kink shaming.