I use LibreTube and it looks like half of the instances keep getting shut down and then get back up, and the speeds for all are atrociously slow that it is just better to watch it on YouTube on Firefox. I heard a while ago YouTube was blocking certain Piped instances but do not know if that is the same case right now.

  • f00f/eris@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    What makes this extra confusing to me, is that this doesn’t seem to happen to the same extent for Invidious instances. I’ve only needed to swap between two instances on Clipious, whereas on LibreTube I was hopping across their entire instance list and sometimes not finding even one working instance.

    • rnd@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seems like on Invidious, the default setting is to still have the end user load the video directly from YouTube, whereas Piped defaults to proxying the video through its server as well. I would imagine this makes Piped servers a lot more noticable to YouTube.

    • MagneticFusion@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea it’s a bummer because I love LibreTubes UI compared to NewPipes outdated UI but it looks like I might have to switch to NewPipe

      • M. Orange@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it helps, the NewPipe developers have been working on a full rewrite of the app, but I don’t know when it will come out.

        That said, I would probably use invidious in browsers. I haven’t really had any problems with it whereas I’ve had nothing but issues with Piped for months.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve seen messages on a few invidious instances saying that they’re having to deal with Google blocking them too