Not a good look for Firefox. Third partners and device fingerprinting clearly mentioned in the documents.

The move is the latest development in a series of shifts Mozilla has undergone over the past year.

The gecko engine and Firefox forks, such as Tor, Mullvad, Librewolf, and Arkenfox, are stables of private, open source web browsing.

In fact, Mozilla’s is one of the few browser engines out there, in a protocol-heavy industry that many say only corporate or well-funded non-profits can reliably develop.

What is more, daily driving the more hardened-for-privacy Firefox derivatives can be frowned upon by many sites, including your bank and workplace.

Mozilla’s enshittification leaves the open source community without a good alternative to Firefox, after years of promoting it as a privacy-friendly alternative to spyware-cum-browser Chrome.

  • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I thought Mullvad was the best in anti-fingerprinting. Anyone can check their own configuration with EFF’s “cover your tracks” site.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      They slightly edge out brave on vanilla. Once you load all of your plugins and stuff braves a little better at lying about it. To be fair they’re both close enough it doesn’t matter either one will get the job done. I usually think of mull as a leave it vanilla and use it when you need to leave no trace.

      • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 seconds ago

        Note just to be sure, Mull is a different thing than Mullvad. What you wrote makes sense for Mullvad, but I am not so sure if this is the case with Mull, the mobile app.