• PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Me: That can’t possibly be right. There is no way the LAPD costs more to operate than the entire country of Madagascar.

    Also me: Well I’ll be damned

    (It looks to me like 2b, not 3b, but that’s still a fuck of a lot of money, and still more than Madagascar)

    (Edit: A fun side note to this is that it probably means that if the LAPD really wanted to, it would have the ability to win a war with Madagascar and take it over.)

    • melp@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It was 3b until the George Floyd protests. Then we defunded them. Now they’re trying to claw it back. They just got 500mill added to their budget last year.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Ah, got it. Makes sense.

        Personally I do not like defunding as a primary solution. If you have a shitty police department, and you give them less money, you’re going to get a much shittier police department, of a slightly smaller size, and you’re going to have more crime. That doesn’t sound like progress. I can see it making sense where there is so much bloat in the budget that they’re getting tons of money they don’t need, but even then, you won’t have solved anything by giving them less money except for an economic problem, which usually isn’t the most pressing concern if you have bad police.

        I feel like: Make the right reforms so that the department won’t be shitty, and then you won’t need to punish them, and they can do their jobs. Although where the LAPD is concerned that might involve sending them to Madagascar and starting over from scratch.