I know that. But if a site rule state that posts should be “true and helpful” it leave no room (legally) for shitposting communities. I assume this is not the idea, so the wordings should take that into account.
I know that. But if a site rule state that posts should be “true and helpful” it leave no room (legally) for shitposting communities. I assume this is not the idea, so the wordings should take that into account.
Users are encouraged to post information they believe is true and helpful.
Even in shitpost/meme communities?
I understand this intended mainly toward health and news communities but as a site rule there might need an exception for other type of communities.
It’s a Druze village currently in an Israeli territory. Some residents have Syrian citizenship and some Israeli citizenship.
Israeli settlers continue to illegally settle lands outside of Israel’s borders
It’s a Druze village established in 18th century, not an “Israeli settlement”. Try to know the difference before commenting.
When I started reading your post I thought you are going to say “please don’t bother us, use the report button”. I was pleased to see that not only you did not discourage users to contact the admin team, you opened more channels to do so. Kudos!
Could be this:
https://github.com/Qwant/erdapfel/issues/1474
In the short term, the dedicated Qwant Maps application will no longer be maintained, in favour of developing the mapping experience within the search engine, in particular through searches for places or addresses. We are gradually updating our service presentation pages to reflect this change in priorities.
Would you like automatic update to mess with your disk partition allocations without requesting explicit permission to do so? As long as searching the error code would give me the explanation and solution I’m Ok with manual fix this time
The issue can be resolved by allocating an additional 250 MB of storage space to the recovery partition. Details on how to do that can be found here.
However, at least on Windows 10, Microsoft has acknowledged that an automatic resolution for this issue will not be released and as such, the only way to fix this is manually.
So there is a solution and the headline should be “Microsoft admits it can’t automatically fix…”
That definitely define my everyday job experience.
It all depends on the project and the team. On some, you work with and along the PM and all is good, and other times you get dictated unconnected requests that you need to fight or ignore.
I (programmer and team leader) get requests from the king (management and project manager) and pass them to the peasants (code monkeys), clean after their shit (QA and code review). I get peanuts in return while the king keep most of the loot.
My hometown is spending more than 1m US$ for a simple one lane roundabout, assuming an up-to-code terminal and runway would not be at the same price levels.
The amount of 13 million US$ seems cheap for the work needed.
Because of this the reaction will not work outside of carefully controlled laboratory conditions, ruling out apocalyptic scenarios where the process runs away and destroys all available DNA by building versions of itself with it.
This isn’t something that’s taking over the world just yet
So there’s always that kind of uncertainty; you think you can build safeguards in, but they’re not necessarily a guarantee that it will be safe
Very reassuring, nothing to worry about
Not if some wiseass manager decided to turn off all logs “to save payments on storage”
For most people the “best music” is the one created during their teenage years.
It all depends on the implementation and need.
In-memory structures are usually faster to work with, but harder to coordinate multiple updates from multiple sources (different applications, services, etc).
Databases have all sort of failsafe mechanisms to ensure data integrity and recovery options, in most times there is no need to reinvent it all over again.
Persistent - do you need to access the data again once your program was finished? How often does the data change by other programs/tasks once you read it? How big is your data and how complex are the connections between your data objects?
Many times the implementation is a mixed approach. It is better to know and calculate the needs before you start your project, but as it usually happen, once you get performance issues, you start optimizing adding in-memory cache or scale to a bigger database.
See Calculating Heavenly Chips