They basically want free labor.
They basically want free labor.
Doesn’t gnome already have this?
Lol. Git itself can act as a server over the git protocol. Might have been easier 🤪
There’s plenty of git forges that aren’t GitHub. Git itself has nothing to do with central servers and can theoretically be used in a completely decentralized manner.
Ah right. What I really meant to ask was if it can do protocols other than http.
Which I don’t think it can…
Are you able to tunnel ports other than 80 and 443 through Cloudflare?
How will you handle the planned rewrite of Iceshrimp?
Definitely a good way to do it. Photoprism supports uploading to WebDAV for sharing. Could front a CDN upload with a web dav server 🤔
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. I am using photoprism for photo management. It doesn’t really support S3 or any CDN. You could use a fuse filesystem or something, but it’s very slow.
Where are you uploading galleries? Just your own HDD connected to a static website?
Word can in fact open odt files. It was added quite a long time ago. Don’t know how good the compatibility is, though
The fork was originally created because upstream NewPipe elected not to include sponsor block functionality.
Don’t think the snap is an official Mozilla package.
There’s a lava flow on the other side of the barrier that was built. It’s inching into the new construction at the edge of the town and has already consumed one house. Probably it will keep going, possibly to the harbor.
But wouldn’t you calculate the time in the future in the right time zone and then store it back as UTC?
I use Simple Login a lot too. But be careful, as some sites reject these email addresses. Or in the case of Shell Recharge, change their business logic to reject the email addresses without letting me change to another email … Haven’t been able to log in for months 🙃
Didn’t they contribute networking stuff?
Not necessarily. While of course in many many cases, open source is a volunteer effort, there’s usually some implicit transaction going on. Whether that’s improving the software for yourself and passing that on to others, being a business and improving a library or something you use that helps your project generate revenue, or even a straight up commercial transaction.
But in all these cases, the open source project can be taken by you (or others) and you can do whatever you want with it. In the case of Winamp here, you cannot do any of that. It would be different if they were paying for contributions. But they’re not, so.