Anyway, more access to the open source packages can’t be bad.
Anyway, more access to the open source packages can’t be bad.
I think it said it’s deprecated or something? I’m not sure, I just know I had problems downloading packages before.
I don’t think it was setup.py . I think I tried to download it directly through pip install xx==0.4.0 or something (the version was required by the program) and it said the package doesn’t exist.
But do Appimages make the dependencies code available? They pack everything into one working program, but what about the packages?
I couldn’t download it even if I wanted to. That’s what I mean. It returns a message saying it isn’t supported.
If prior versions were not support by pip anymore, so yes, if it were removed. There are cases of packages not being supported by the platforms, aren’t there? I’ve run into cases where the package was fully deprecated and not useable or downloadable anymore.
What do you mean?
I just find that if pip did not support that version anymore, the software would be lost. As that is covered by making executables, as I mentioned them. But what if I wanted to have access to the libraries that were used in the program? That wouldn’t be possible. Because all we get in the source code is the dependency fetching, not the dependencies themselves.
It would be good to have an alternative where you get all that you need to compile the code again, not depending on fetching them from websites that might not even have them anymore.
This mentality of ephemeral code just adheres to the way big tech would like to do things, with programmed obsolescence.
An alternative to that way of doing things would be nice and would make sure we get access to the same working open source program in 30 or 40 years.
I don’t know about where you live, but here the drug lords owns some territory. And within that territory, they take political actions like closing the nearby churches, for example. I think selling actual medication could serve their purpose very well. They already sell smartphones for a low price to the local people ($15).
I personally think open source software and hardware is a good starting point to making DIY stuff legal in the future.
I see drug lords getting into this if it is feasible and it isn’t a good scenario. It would paint them as real saviors and make the situation more unstable.
As is typical of Piracy.
There was a serious fight against this in the COVID years, saying it was fighting anti-science that was recommending fake medicine to people. How can this model possibly subvert what happened in those years?
If Health won’t make piracy legal, it’s hard to believe anything else will.
This is incredible. But how to make this legal?
Yes. I mean that copyright just protects those people that were selected by the industry. I don’t mind paying for the artist’s work. But I still think it should be DRM free and easily distributable - so people can support the artist if they like the work.
Bertrand Russell tried to logically confirm that 2 + 2 is 4. You can check it in Principia Mathematica
No. Printing statements, using console inputs and building little games like tic tac toe and crosswords isn’t the right way to learn Computer Science. It is the way things are currently done, but you learn much more through open source code and trying to build useful things yourself. I would never go back to doing those little chores to get a grade.
There are lots of studies out there, and many of them contradict each other. Having a study with references contribute to the discussion, but it isn’t the absolute truth.
Hey, that’s a cool thing to do! I’ll try it. Learning a new language through LLMs sounds cool.
He is cross checking
I appreciate the honesty.