“Tech” is a conflated term. The way I read OP is that they don’t want their cars main user interface to be a smartphone app. Doesn’t mean the car can’t be technologically advanced.
Sure, in the same way volcanologists could mutate to survive being submerged in lava.
I’ve heard the exact same analogy applied to alcohol killing bacteria and it doesn’t convince me
576 rankine
Personally, my brain manages to filter out anything with a leading underscore (I don’t know the origin offhand, I think some system I worked with at some point used those on files that I knew I didn’t care about). So when coworkers use leading underscores it slows me down a bit.
It does work though
Tangential, but Blind Guardian has one
deleted by creator
It’s not obvious to me how these things are related, could you elaborate?
deleted by creator
I’m lacking context or something because I don’t understand why that is so significant.
Can you please elaborate?
I tried looking this up and could not find a source to support this claim, do you have one you could share?
Is this…antisemitism?
That one and “FAFO” in its various incarnations can take a break for a bit, IMO
I haven’t heard of this. I saw from a YouTube comment that it’s a mod. But nothing more in the post or youtube description? Just a video of walking down a hallway? Maybe I missed something in the audio because I watched muted?
What is it? Should I care?
Yeah I could google it. Should I bother?
I was about to ask if, since you’re “extremely worried” about this (seemingly esoteric) potentially unconstitutional move, how you cope with the rest of the world.
Then I saw the second paragraph and it seems that you don’t.
New York Times, NPR, and noncredibledefense
A lie, or just something that too often gets conflated with “the economy?”
Whenever I see a fucked up, but not world-news-worthy story like this, it is always some guy spamming fucked up news from India in multiple communities it doesn’t belong in. And I always block them.
Fair. When I read “no one actually wants to use nukes” I think “no nuclear power’s public geopolitical doctrine involves a nuclear first strike.” But individuals will not necessarily toe that line.