james

That’s a fair point but it looks like it is in chromium.

Pretty sure the answer is: Yes, since I believe it’s part of the open source project chromium, it would be under the same open source license.

There’s a post here saying it’s down but no updates: https://very.bignutty.xyz/notes/9hek2yioxnuw9f15

You can learn how to make a donut: https://youtu.be/nIoXOplUvAw

set -o vi

That’s already happening: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/new-windows-11-build-ships-with-more-rust-based-kernel-features/

Using their own new protocol that no one else uses and they probably don’t even implement themselves yet.

lol thanks for the correction

Edit: looks like this is wrong lol, that’s what I get for not verifying. So maybe $ does make more sense!

Original message:

I think I’d go with #.

The non-root user probably doesn’t have permission to run the sudo command as www-data user, but root does.

Unless you previously set permissions for the non-root user to sudo as www-data.

The problem with that is you can’t unblock what your instance blocks/defederates from.

I was recently trying to set up headless Wayland session with wayvnc and labwc but I really wish there was a more basic pre-configured out-of-the-box lightweight window manager like IceWM for Wayland…

They have an integration with container tabs, I’ve only used it once but imagine it could be handy: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/use-multi-account-containers-mozilla-vpn

You wouldn’t download a car, would you?

I don’t think this blocks all cookies, but instead disables all non-essential cookies in those cookie consent dialogs

I don’t have any prior knowledge about it but it looks pretty invasive, I found this interesting article about it:

• https://blog.nem.ec/2020/05/24/ebay-port-scanning/

And this Firefox extension to block sites from scanning local ports:

• https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/port-authority/