That is basically how ITAR export controls work, but only for much more complicated weapon parts like nukes and fighter jets. It’s basically impossible to stop the flow of stuff that any country can make. The parts in this article would likely fall under EAR99, explicitly allowed to sell to any not-embargoed country.
Source: was a business area export representative (BAER) and yes I know this is an oversimplification
Perhaps the tankies should have voted for her multiple times
Genocide denial is fascist.
it’s
Case in point
The liberals never believed that accusation themselves; it was just a way to neg leftists into voting for Harris.
Trump got more votes than every other party combined.
Also the faucet hole is 1 centimeter from the back edge of the sink.
Perfection is the enemy of the good; climate change is even worse.
You are being obtuse because you don’t mind supporting homophobia but don’t want to feel bad about it.
He got caught sending money to a bigoted organization, got in trouble, and then embraced dark money.
Until he makes it right to the LGBTQ+ community and makes his finances public, only a fool or another bigot would give him the benefit of the doubt.
To add: the CEO got kicked out of Mozilla and switched to crypto after he was caught donating to outlaw gay marriage.
Is this not a relatively mainstream belief?
Why do marginalized users keep using that website at all?
Not every transaction, just the ones that open and close payment channels. This deletes data that would be needed to reconstruct an overwhelming majority of transactions.
(This is how Bitcoin’s lightning network works.)
If he doesn’t like hoarding, why doesn’t it just inflate?
Couldn’t they run a Chaumian digital cash server? It’s got top notch privacy, with the only downside of being a trusted central authority… which fiat currencies need anyways.
It’s because you’re taking a stance against cashless, which sounds paranoid and weird to most people.
Take a stand against VISA and PayPal. Then the bad guy isn’t “our” government, it’s corporations everyone already hates. And it references problems people already experience.
It’s much easier to explain how the situation is already bad than it is to argue how it “could become” bad.
What if it bounced through multiple peers between sender and recipient, encrypted on each hop like Tor? Then they’d need to actually break the encryption, or compromise every hop.
This is a false flag study to undermine public support for mathematics research!
Sorry, crypto is back in season.