You’re only strengthening my theory that you have absolutely no reading comprehension. Or you’re just trolling. Literally none of the things you just said make any logical sense whatsoever and I refuse to believe that anyone that passed elementary school can be so absolutely illiterate.

Please do tell me how if I wrote the whole definition there of “determination of the value, nature, character, or quality of something or someone” instead of shortening it to just “determine quality” it would make my entire point completely invalid.

And literally how can you look at my comment and, with straight face, say that I didn’t address your claim of “reframing”. It was all literally addressing it. But ok, you’re a moron so you might have not understood my point so let me put it in simpler terms:

Me show you the definition of word Me give an example Me refer to definiton to show example can be described with word You: that’s reframing

Do you see how absurdly idiotic you’re being?

I literally gave you a definition that says a review means to determine quality, I just assumed you would make the connection between that definition and the sentence you quoted, but apparently you’re too dense for that. The only error I made in this conversation is assuming that your reading comprehension is above that of a 3rd grader

I did and it does. For example the Merriam-Webster English Dictionary defines review as:

a critical evaluation

Whereas evaluation is defined as:

determination of the value, nature, character, or quality of something or someone

It’s subtle, but it’s in there. The examples you gave don’t fall under this definition, as they don’t determine anything, they’re just statements of facts. However the statement “this game is shit” is a determination of quality and thus a review. If you just stop for a moment and think about it, you’ll realise that it is impossible to determine the quality of a video game in a purely objective way.

All reviews are subjective by definition. Your examples are observations, not reviews. A review is my opinion of the product based on my experience. Like honestly, if you ever wrote a review about anything on Steam, or IMDB, or GoodReads or whatever, go find it and remove everything that’s subjective and see what you’ll end up with. Not like you’d be able to post it, because they require you give a score, which is inherently subjective.

No, it wasn’t. This shit has been common in sci-fi for decades. He just gave it a fancy name and pretended he came up with it.

Such as having to withstand over 100 tons of air pressure per square meter

Moderation is not censorship. For all we know those videos could show beheadings or call for genocide. TikTok has every right to remove that. Moreover, I think it’s their obligation to remove it.

That’s not to mention the reusability of asphalt:

Regarding the circular economy, the data from reporting countries showed that in such countries, 72% of the reclaimed asphalt available for the industry was re-used, 25% recycled and only 3% used on unknown applications or put to landfill.

Source

It is

Edit: “Alpine Linux remains an exception due to its use of musl libc instead of glibc.”

Yea, it really does sound like you’re taking crazy pills. It’s not a movie, not everyone that critiques someone you like does it as part of their grand plan of world domination. There is a very simple explanation of his motives: he’s a journalist and he’s doing his job, like he always did. Trying to assign some neferious motives to, out of all people, Steve Burke, who has shown nothing but complete integrity in the past, is just absolutely ridiculous.

It’s our job to ignore relationships

They handled LTT the same way they would, and did in the past, any other company. If you think it’s bad that they don’t do favouritism, then there’s something seriously messed up about your moral compass.

Cambridge Dictionary says:

We use can, could and may to ask for permission. We use can and may, but not could, to give permission.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary says:

The use of can to ask or grant permission has been common since the 19th century and is well established

So you’re not only being petty, you’re also plainly wrong

Ok, smart

As someone else pointed out: according to Apollo dev Reddit gets at absolute most 12 cents per user per month from ads. Without data collection the ads would be far less profitable, so I’d say that donating 1 dollar a YEAR would actually result in more revenue for the maintainers than ads.

Out of curiosity: why don’t you delete Reddit entirely? I did that and am very happy.