You’re right. Everything is suspiciously wordy, substance is sparse, and every headline is clickbaity. It’s like they tuned the content specifically for google, not human readers…
EDIT: Because my comment was also lacking substance: e.g. the Steam Deck review in “30 Best Retro Handhelds Of 2024 [All Reviewed]” says “Yes it’s big, and the battery life… pretty terrible”, then gives no further information about size or battery life, which seems extremely relevant to potential buyers. They wrote 8 paragraphs and shared only 3 shallow facts.
Why do I find “match-3” most offensive part of that thought?