Dude, i was about to call you stupid, but just listen. Last 4 AC games intentionally was made with grind barriers and selling customers time capsules. Don’t you think they know how you are gonna play and never return? I almost sure, they gonna design their game the way you will just make yourself invested to the story to the end of month, pay for the second one and get back only to find out mediocre continuation and some cliffhanger to return to in the next month aka mmorpg treatment.

Ubisoft games already sales with over a 70% discount within the year of the release, why wouldn’t you simply wait to play this mediocrity of gaming industry?

That’s incredible take for the thread about league being not accessible to play on linux anymore

Anyone sane played league of legends on steamdeck when there is dota?

I read the headline here, on the site and read the topic and i yet to realise how was riding the motorcycle: the man or the lion

They will not. What happened with Cyberpunk happened with Gwent before and nobody gave a single fuck.

Dude, murica is batshit crazy

It’s really hard at the beginning

Dude, that last guy. It was such tricky thing

I’d call it the best detective game if it wasn’t for the shadow of the doubt

Just bought, want to try

Shadow of the doubt

Return of the obra dinn

Hypnospace outlaw (haven’t played yet)

Lucifer among us (criminally short)

Into the breach

Curse of the dead gods

Sea of survivors

God of weapons

Tanuki sunset

En garde

Human fall flat

Later alligator

Dredge

Hades

Party hard 2

Abandon ship

Passpartout

Cloadpunk

Lil gator game

Mosa lina

Competitive nature is rarely appropriate

The only thing that matters to people who wait for this game is WHEN will they add boarding and combat on the land. It’s not IS it there or not, it’s just WHEN ubisoft will finally give up on pretending that they don’t know what everyone always wanted.

I worried about armor being too powerful nowadays. There is only desolator left for people now

Technically you can

Also, giving people the key to understanding underlying things usually makes people don’t enjoy the scheme. For example, i can’t play most of Blizzard games cus i know, their scheme is “if players suffers enough, he will be happier to get something, so grind justified”

And to add cherry on top, he might be under some sort of NDA still

Gonna admit, didn’t expected to witness bionic eyes becoming obsolete in my lifetime.

That’s just pity excuse and everyone knows it

had a rich story with great characters and an

Subjectively. Like it or not, as it was at release all three “different” starting options was considered to be the same with only small difference in between.

Otherwise, it was just default CDPR style linear story.

I didn’t played it, but from the looks of those who played, cyberpunk isn’t even considered to be immersive simulator. I yet to hear people discuss different ways of going through same exact levels.

Not to say, CDPR wasn’t even able to make one simple city to work while Bethesda played with galaxies. Scale, man, it means a fucking lot, when you actually consider world building.

Yeah, there might be some shit to collect in some locations cuz CDPR was trying to duplicate GTA. There might be linear story aka “we tried to copy GTA” and subjectively you might find it interesting, but it’s just funny to consider this game to be immersive sim and compare it to starfield. It’s gta without everything that makes gta great

Cyberpunk is a shitty game that doesn’t even deserve to be viewed as sub par even to this day. That’s my point.

Other compelling options available in the gaming market

Names everyone’s game of the year and complete disaster from idk 3 years ago that’s somehow started to be playable after several patches and fanboys pretending it is a great game.