Lol they said “threatening violence” because it was the easiest thing to ban you with. The real reason you got banned is that you’re a psycho, man. You sound like you are saying you wish you were allowed to hurt or kill your own children, and you’re talking about them as property. That’s crazy person shit.
I have some obscure tastes and have been shocked by what I can find on soulseek
Certainly not
Fair, low-risk not no risk, but a good buy
And the article you’re commenting on is about their global share of gold. So, rather than just propagandistic, I guess your pro-China rhetoric is also irrelevant here.
Not really. Globally, money still brings power. They have incredibly capitalistic international trade and relations.
But it is your comment, the even more propagandistic one about Xi’s humble, laudable, selfless annual salary
So you’re anti-propaganda and globally aware, but still spreading CCP propaganda? Why share this article of you want people not to believe in political deception?
But when money fails (hyperinflation, sanctions, digital collapse, bank failures, violent revolution, etc.), countries who already have gold reserves will be the only ones with anything of value.
Beyond that, just by virtue of the fear of any of those events or general international turmoil rising, the value of gold rises, too, as one of very few stores of wealth that can survive any such event. Investing in gold is a great low-risk move for guaranteed returns on huge reserves.
Edit: I don’t know why people are downvoting this lol. Talk to literally anyone in finance.
Nah just gonna laugh at this specific reaction a little bit.
I’m 99.99% with you on the sentiment, right up to particularly egregious (and not culturally or ethnically significant) haircuts. On that one, I may continue to do like only half of this woman’s hair, and throw a little shade.
And seem to be real sensitive about it.
Lol alright. Gimme your worst.
I get where you’re coming from, but an intentional, statement haircut that you could easily change feels like it’s ok to make a statement about, while I never would about someone’s weight, height, etc.
If I posted a picture of myself and the hair was what people roasted me for, I’d be happy lol.
Yahoo was a massive failed effort, but it hardly even compares to that haircut.
There’s a big difference between “reflecting on him” and actually being the one to write the policy. I don’t see why the former is an issue.
Imagine what the best one could do
Ah yes. Characterizing an entire population by the acts of the most extreme. Always accurate.
“Canadians aren’t saints. They’re a conquesting and genocidal people who wiped out an entire population of natives and continue to marginalize those who are left.” And going by your argument, this means we shouldn’t feel too bad if any of them get assassinated?
“No, I am your motherfucking father.”