This exactly. At the broadest range you can say there are certain qualities that are more prevalent in one age group compared to another age group, but at the individual person level those trends are meaningless. Any individual person can be conservative or liberal, be caring or selfish, be x or y.

True, but not paying for maintenance sure does help the executive hit his quarterly numbers to receive a bonus

Please try not using initialisms that a general audience won’t know. That’s why i had to look up the previous one and quoted the info so other people wouldn’t have to look it up also. USV doesn’t even show up in a googling

EDIT

I found it, USV means a drone boat

“A close-in weapon system (CIWS) is a point-defense weapon system for detecting and destroying short-range incoming missiles and enemy aircraft which have penetrated the outer defenses, typically mounted on a naval ship. Nearly all classes of larger modern warships are equipped with some kind of CIWS device.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-in_weapon_system

/s

I’m sure you’re not nearly as loathe as you think.

I’m sure you like being able to plug any device into any power outlet and have it work correctly and safely every time without even having to think about it.

I’m sure you like being able to use your cell phone and wifi without it being an unusable mess of different technologies all trying to use the same frequencies.

Etc. Etc. Etc.

When an aspect of technology becomes far reaching enough that it effects essentially everyone and every device, and there are far reaching consequences to it not being interoperable, then that’s exactly the type of situation where it’s good for government to work with experts in the field and decide on an official enforced standard

Cool! Love it! Thanks for being a friend Kenya!

Mac is easier than Windows, sure, but not easier than a chromebook. Nothing is simpler than a Chromebook. You can do much more with a Mac, but a chromebook is much easier.

Then her situation isn’t applicable to this topic

Sounds like all she needs is a dirt cheap chromebook then

So then the only way to make it fair is for us to invest equally as much into our own green energy industries

Britain’s richest family has got to be the royals, right? Some wacky paperwork might make it look like it’s not that way, but i have to assume that that’s the case unless an in depth investigation specifically proves that it ISN’T true.

Wouldn’t the AC still be dehumidifying the air circulation on the upper floors?

In what way is the hardware locked down? Is this something new with the M chips?

Phones play movies. If they make the seatback system annoying then people will just stop using it and download movies from Netflix or wherever

They must’ve paid for themselves many times at this point, even considering that in 1992 they had a much higher price than it costs now

I have no info guess about this, but i strongly guess that the arpeggio sign goes to the left of a flat sign

Sure, but OP worded their headline to sound like they were talking about the google payment system itself, which is not what this news is about

No, the standalone google pay APP is just having it’s features transitioned into google wallet. Google payment services is totally unchanged.

Quote:

Anywhere you normally use Google Pay — from checking out online to tapping and paying in stores — remains the same. If you use your Android phone to shop in stores where Google Pay is accepted, you can continue to tap to pay in stores with the Google Wallet app.

It all depends on the value of what you’re trying to secure, and if an attacker knows the value of what’s in the account, and if the attacker has access to hints about the password you used to narrow down the possibilities. The researchers knew all of that info and they still didn’t want to bother trying to crack the password until they found an additional way to narrow down the possibilities even further.

There’s no such thing as perfect security. A lock only needs to be strong enough to make it not worth breaking into for what’s in there