deleted by creator

LET’S ALL LOVE LAIN

STCTD?

Scenario time: A loved one has recently passed away, and I want to find all the photos I have of them. I would love to be able to have a local AI perform facial recognition to help me find these photos. The classification and tagging info doesn’t get fed into surveillance capitalist garbage, and I’m still able to benefit.

“What is this level of grand security…” Enumerated here: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

Once manufacturers can implement those things, then you will have an alternative to Google hardware for running Graphene. I’m not telling people to trust anything, don’t put words in my mouth.

Who is PrivacyPhones and why should I believe they are in any way affiliated with Graphene?

GrapheneOS has defined a set of security standards for their operating system which have hardware requirements. These standards have been published and there have been efforts to engage with hardware manufacturers to adopt the required hardware. Blame the manufacturers for skimping on security, rather than Graphene being unwilling to compromising their values.

I wouldn’t because I am not a dev. I stay in my wheelhouse and don’t try to pitch features as something they aren’t.

Calling the anti-features indicator a rating system is a biiiiiit of a stretch.

The security of your key is determined by the strength of your passphrase. Am I missing something?

deleted by creator

So something changed between then and now. Wish the picture had absolute timestamps instead of the relative ones. I’m on mobile so I’m not about to try to dive into EXIF to find out when that was happening.

Can we not with the “basement dweller” bullshit? Developers of free, open source software are volunteers putting forth a lot of time, energy, and effort only to get derided for it.

Not my post, dude. Look at the people you are replying to.

I didn’t suggest shit, so please don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks for the citations though.

As mentioned on another one of your comments, I am having a hard time finding the science you reference.

Can’t have any nuanced discussion here! Glad to see people such as yourself engaging in reductionism and shutting down thinking, because all interactions online have to be boiled down to five words TL;DR pithy sound bites.

Leave the shit on Twitter, we can do better here.

Having a hard time finding the evidence you mention, got a citation? First few articles I saw were actually advising against blanket pornography bans.

If I remember correctly F-Droid supports reproducible builds, but it’s a matter of the app developer supporting them. So there is light at the end of the tunnel, we’re just not there yet.

Is there some signing in place to ensure it’s not a malicious repo? I don’t really trust unofficial F-Droid repos.

Must be fuckin’ nice. - Squirrely Dan