What was breathless about the article? Seemed pretty matter of fact in its presentation.

You call the other person a name

You don’t respond to anything they say directly

You do it twice in the same thread

You call something context without providing context

Why are there quotes around that? Is that a quote from someone?

Still not describing anything that indicates it backs it.

Good news though, I did reply again so feel free to condescendingly demonstrate your intelligence again.

But it’s not backed by energy.

The energy was consumed in the process of creating the crypto, that energy no longer exists and since it doesn’t exist it can’t back anything.