Tech’s broken promises: Streaming is now just as expensive and confusing as cable. Ubers cost as much as taxis. And the cloud is no longer cheap::Some tech is getting pricier and looking a lot like the older services it was supposed to beat. From video streaming to ride-hailing and cloud computing.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember that every invention discovered and improvement made before capitalism, happened before capitalism.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember that even in a system in which workers own companies, those workers still want to make more money

      A profit motive is not unique to nor a product of capitalism.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not making any profit does not imply running for losses.

        Many companies can run for minimal margins, ensuring they can pay staff, stock and services.

        Profit is what is left on the table after every expense is paid, including salaries, which usually doesn’t reach the workers pockets.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No but companies raising prices to make more money is absolutely related to making profit, and a worker-owned company still has a profit motive.

          Companies being able to run at a loss is a feature of capitalism, not a bug. Most small businesses do not turn a profit for two to three years.

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a company sets its mark at not making profit, it does not mean it runs at a loss.

            Was I unclear?

            Profit is what is left after all expenses are paid, including salaries, and a company can run with a non profit objective and still create jobs with fair salaries.

            Profit is the end goal for the so called investors that have no real involvement in the day to day operations of companies and demand quarterly reports with ever increasing revenue.

            If a company makes enough money to pay salaries, replenish stocks and/or provide ita services and pay its daily and monthly expenses it is not running on a loss. Profit is not a requirement for a business.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am aware that non-profits exist as a concept, but that’s irrelevant to what we are discussing which is how profitability and viability are not necessarily linked

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those workers still want to live. The money is the means- controlled by those with the most money.

        Capitalism and democracy as exclusive concepts.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          None of this makes any sense, both on its face and as a response to my comment

          • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bold deconstruction of the argument. Capitalism didn’t invent iPhones, workers did. There are economic systems other than capitalism, that can do better, without the unilateral domination of capital.

    • msbeta1421@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You act like capitalism is something that was invented. Market economies have existed since the dawn of time.

      Think of it more like a spectrum where free market and unregulated capitalism is on one end and economies under total state control are at the other.

      There is clear evidence that one side of that spectrum favors innovation more than the other.

      I guess you could argue that one end of the spectrum is more “moral” than the other, but I would counter that the opposite end is amoral rather than immoral.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. You mean capitalism is inherent in the matrix of the space-time continuum as opposed to invented?

        2. Market economies have not all been capitalistic.

        3. Innovation is not the singular motivation of mankind. Survival, comfort, stability, peace, equality are more important.

        4. An amoral society is no better than an immoral society.