• go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Did you even look at the article or did you see “Cloud flare” in the title and immediately grabbed your pitchfork?

    The article is outlining a situation where Cloudflare is advocating to maintain privacy.

    • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      This haves nothing to do with the article. Cloudflare overall haves too much power on the Internet. On August 31st 2022, Matthew Prince (Cloudflare’s CEO) released a statement defending his role as a service provider and not a regulatory body. But 3 days later, Cloudflare blocks a website called Kiwifarms. You maybe thinking, “Wait, that goes against his first statement he made.”. You’re right. I ask you, do you want a company like that to have so much power over the Internet?

      • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        omg that bar that kicked me out for being a belligerent asshole has stopped being a bar and now they’ve become the police. They have too much power!

      • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They can be service provider and can stop providing those services to, well, basically anyone. It’s not like they literally blocked them off the internet.

      • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Business, the core of their business model over any other CDN is that steadfast privacy that they will only give information when it’s mandated by a court order