• Konomi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If the Matrix Foundation can deliver on all the points of this blog post then Matrix will take off as a platform. The problem I have is that in the past they’ve been poor at handling issues in any sort of reasonable time frame, or at all.

    Hoping they’ll eventually turn over a new leaf.

  • jg1i@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Hopefully the clients get much better. I convinced a few friends to get on Matrix last year… and… boy… it was a terrible experience. Everyone ended up going back to Discord and they probably won’t trust another recommendation from me.

    • Konomi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve been very mindful not to recommend Matrix until the clients and protocol become much more stable. When you’re recommending platforms to average users you really need to jump in and try it yourself. If too many problems come up just don’t recommend. Or alternatively do recommend if you want them to leave you alone :3

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      UX is very difficult, unfortunately, especially for open-source projects where the contributors are usually programmers and not so much UX/product managers.

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    But I haven’t even escaped the original matrix. Or the matrix reloaded.

  • nadiaraven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I tried running a matrix server last year. I guess I will try again and see if a normie like me can make it somewhat usable.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      With docker it’s quite easy (assuming you are familiar with docker)

      But docker / containerization is a skill that becomes really really helpful to learn if you are interested in this type of thing.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        rolling their own crypto

        No, it uses well-known, well-proven, standard crypto.

        It also uses double-ratchet key management, much like what Signal does.

        The reference server is a bit heavy if you’re federating with large public rooms, but lighter alternative servers are available.

        • jimmy90@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          they do have a special crypto usage which they have sensibly rewritten in Matrix 2.0

    • Hiko0@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Encryption is a mess with Matrix. Randomly doesn‘t decrypt messages. Most non-techies don‘t get the process of saving key files or creating secure passphrases.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Looks like someone didn’t read the article. See part 4: Invisible Encryption. (Also note the Conclusion paragraph that explains the new functionality is only just starting to appear in clients.)

        • Hiko0@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          I did. I referred to the current version and the comment that is has always been a great project.

          • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            So you were aware that this announcement includes fixes for the encryption issues, yet you decided to post a comment complaining about them anyway, ignoring the point of this post and giving readers the false impression that the issues are unaddressed.

            And you did it just to contradict someone who finds the project useful.

            That’s not helpful to anyone. Quite the opposite, I’d say.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Honestly in my experience all issues with decryption have been solved for more than a year. No matter if im using android, web or desktop. Idk about apple shit but thats just not a priority probably.

        Todays desktop release finally enables the new voice/video calls/rooms feature which was the last serious complaint i had.

    • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I like this reddit comment’s explanation:

      As someone said before, compare it to E-Mail.

      Matrix ~ smtp/pop3/imap (protocol layer)

      synapse ~ sendmail/postfix/dovecot/exchange/… (server)

      element, fluffy, … ~ thunderbird, outlook, pine, elm, … (clients)

      Everyone can host it’s own server and have it’s on private chat cloud. Thats like E-Mail and other opensource chat servers like Rocket.Chat, Mattermost and so on.

      But like for E-Mail, it is easy possible to federate with others (like mail: “talk” to other mailservers), to be able to chat with people on other Matrix Servers. That’s the difference to most of the other opensource chat.servers, which are stuck to their cloud.

      As for EMail: Choose your best weapon, will say, client or server software. The protocol is free and will stay free. At this time, there’s mainly synapse as the reference implementation from matrix.org and upcoming dendrite, but more servers will be available in future I think. At client side, theres element as the reference implementation and also some others, for example fluffy.chat.

      Another cool feature ist bridging. The protocol specification allows bridges to other chat-systems, so you are for example able to talk to IRC-Servers or XMPP-Servers too. Many bridges are in development, less are stable. But more to come in future.

      Matrix.org is “outsourced” from university and responsble for developing the specs. They are the big brain behind. They also server matrix.org as free service for people to test matrix or use it without having their own servers.

      Element.io is also an outsourced company, which is developing element (reference clients). They are also selling hosted solutions to get money to the project.

      Both are under the roof of the new Vector limited.

      Because the Api is free, everyone can produce own servers an clients and (in theory) no one can take the whole network over. (in practice: if a big company does its own “cool” non open addons and has enough users, the same shit as for xmpp and WhatsApp could happen…)

      Because everyone can host its own servers *and* optionally federate, the same product can be used for high secure private chat-clouds, for example in hostpital, military, schools, whatever, but it can also be uses to talk everyone like e-mail or phone. *And* no one has the masterhost, so no one has all data and no one can change the rules overnight to get money, more data or whatever.

      From functional side: Matrix is what some people call “modern”, it has text chat, you can send files, you can do voice- and video-calls (in element: 1:1, for groups with jisi as backend) and send voice-messages (at least in fluffy.chat, upcoming in element also). You can also plugin things like etherpad or BigBluButton and send cute stickers if needed. You can structure your contacts with “spaces” (beta).

      Element got better and better in the last year and is imho very easy to use for now, but with some last edges. Fluffy is somewhat easier some users as far as I’ve heared but not feature complete.

      I hope, Matrix will be the E-Mail-Version of Chat in the future. I have reviewed some systems for my university and it was the only one from which I think it has the potential to do so. So, give it a try. It’s great.