umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml to

Gaming@lemmy.ml · 3 months ago

Steam doesn’t want to pay arbitration fees, tells gamers to sue instead

arstechnica.com

214

Steam doesn’t want to pay arbitration fees, tells gamers to sue instead

arstechnica.com

umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml to

Gaming@lemmy.ml · 3 months ago

Valve previously sued a law firm in attempt to stop mass arbitration claims.

Chat

petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
link
fedilink
arrow-up
4·
3 months ago
I would if it had any lasting power. I mean, can’t they just push out another eula update 6 months from now when this change is no longer useful to them?

Fuck arbitration, of course, I’m just not expecting this to really mean anything.

Gaming@lemmy.ml

gaming@lemmy.ml

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !gaming@lemmy.ml

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy “anti-woke” energy, you probably shouldn’t be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

43 users / day
512 users / week
1.53K users / month
6.66K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
20.2K subscribers
1.41K Posts
15.8K Comments
Modlog