This is inarguably horrible but the use of AI seems irrelevant.
You could make this same thing with any animation tool. It’s the idea that’s disgusting.
Do you think AI is mentioned because it makes the article seem more up to the minute and in keeping with current tech trends?
“A man drew a disgusting picture of a horrible event using pencils and paper this week.”
If pencils and paper were actively causing a spike of worker precarity, a sudden increase in fraud and identity theft and misuse of people’s personas against their will and without their consent, I wouldn’t blame people for being upset at those fancy new pencils or paper instead of smugly telling them how actually the technology in a vacuum with no one using it is actually harmless.
This is inarguably horrible but the use of AI seems irrelevant. You could make this same thing with any animation tool. It’s the idea that’s disgusting.
Do you think AI is mentioned because it makes the article seem more up to the minute and in keeping with current tech trends?
“A man drew a disgusting picture of a horrible event using pencils and paper this week.”
“Pencils and paper are so awful.”
If pencils and paper were actively causing a spike of worker precarity, a sudden increase in fraud and identity theft and misuse of people’s personas against their will and without their consent, I wouldn’t blame people for being upset at those fancy new pencils or paper instead of smugly telling them how actually
the technology in a vacuum with no one using it is actually harmless.
The ratio of effort to output is off the chart. Don’t pretend you don’t get it.
Why does that matter in this context?
You really don’t see any difference between using an AI to generate powershell script and using AI to milk murder of children?
I don’t see the difference between doing this with AI or doing it with Photoshop. It’s horrible independently of the tools used.
Thanks. That was precisely my point. The tools used to make this are irrelevant. It’s fucked up regardless.