One of the primary purposes of the police is to be able to break labor uprisings. This is so wrong and should be prevented in the strongest way possible. What do you all think? Is the U.S. constitution able to restrict police?

People from outside the U.S., what do you think of this type of idea?

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unlike the nuclear plant example, the supreme Court case did not endanger lives. All it did was threaten profit. Big difference.

    • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It specifically damaged property on purpose.

      Your right to strike isn’t a right to damage stuff that doesn’t belong to you as a bargaining tactic.