Juki@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoEvery tech company rnlemmy.worldimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.8Karrow-down126
arrow-up11.78Karrow-down1imageEvery tech company rnlemmy.worldJuki@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-squareHankMardukas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·1 year agoAlways remember that it will only get better, never worse. They said “computers will never do x” and now x is assumed.
minus-squarePoob@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoThere’s a difference between “this is AI that could be better!” and “this could one day turn into AI.” Everyone is calling their algorithms AI because it’s a buzzword that trends well.
minus-squareFedora@lemmy.haigner.melinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoShit as dumb as decision trees are considered AI. As long as there’s an if-statement somewhere in the app, they can slap the label AI on it, and it’s technically correct.
minus-squareBatman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-211 months agoThat’s not technically correct unless the thresholds in those if statements are updated on the information gained for the data.
Always remember that it will only get better, never worse.
They said “computers will never do x” and now x is assumed.
There’s a difference between “this is AI that could be better!” and “this could one day turn into AI.”
Everyone is calling their algorithms AI because it’s a buzzword that trends well.
Shit as dumb as decision trees are considered AI. As long as there’s an if-statement somewhere in the app, they can slap the label AI on it, and it’s technically correct.
That’s not technically correct unless the thresholds in those if statements are updated on the information gained for the data.