• hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      1000 (milliseconds in a second)/140(hz) = ~7.14ms per hz

      Not sure how you got 30ms being twice as fast as what a 140hz monitor can display.

    • __dev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      AptX LL indeed has ~30ms of latency at the cost of bitrate, but last I checked it’s not supported by Windows out of the box. It’s also been generally dropped in favor of the higher latency AptX Adaptive due to requiring a dedicated wireless antenna. The default experience of Bluetooth is still >200ms of latency. Also 30ms is 4.2 frames at 140Hz.