Hong Kong has announced its first arrests under a new security law - detaining six people for publishing social media posts which “incited hatred” against Beijing.
Five women and one man - including activist Chow Hang Tung - were arrested on Tuesday, it was announced.
Officials said the group were posting messages targeting a “sensitive date” - reported locally as the Tiananmen Square anniversary on 4 June.
If found guilty, the group could face up to seven years in prison under the harsher penalties brought in by the new law, known as Article 23.
The law, which was fast-tracked through Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing parliament in March, covers treason, sedition and state secrets, and allows for trials to be held behind closed doors.
It expands on the national security law, imposed by Beijing in 2020.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Hong Kong has announced its first arrests under a new security law - detaining six people for publishing social media posts which “incited hatred” against Beijing.Five women and one man - including activist Chow Hang Tung - were arrested on Tuesday, it was announced.Officials said the group were posting messages targeting a “sensitive date” - reported locally as the Tiananmen Square anniversary on 4 June.If found guilty, the group could face up to seven years in prison under the harsher penalties brought in by the new law, known as Article 23.The law, which was fast-tracked through Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing parliament in March, covers treason, sedition and state secrets, and allows for trials to be held behind closed doors.It expands on the national security law, imposed by Beijing in 2020.Hong Kong’s government says is necessary for stability, but its introduction raised fears that civil liberties would be further eroded.
Ms Chow was already in prison facing charges under the initial national security law.A barrister, she is known for helping organise Tiananmen Square memorial events in the city.
For decades, Hong Kong was the only Chinese city where these commemorations were allowed, under the city’s semi-autonomous economic, political and legal set up - known as “one country, two systems” - established when the city was handed over to China by the UK in 1997.But events remembering the 1989 incident, which saw China crush peaceful protests in Beijing with tanks and troops, were banned in 2020.According to the South China Morning Post, Tuesday’s charges related to a Facebook group where a series of posts had appeared remembering the previous events.Secretary for Security Chris Tang - who confirmed they were Facebook posts - told reporters the subject was not the problem.He said, quoted by the SCMP, that the accused had “incited hatred against the central government and our Hong Kong government and the judiciary”.
“This incitement of hatred is the cause of the crime,” he added.
The original article contains 322 words, the summary contains 322 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Remember though everybody, there is no difference between China and the US. Totally normal country, nothing to see here, just sending people to prison for years for talking about a “sensitive date”.
The US wishes it could be as brazen as China is. Give it time.
No real argument there, the right-wing in the US is working to try to get there for sure.
Careful not to underestimate the authoritarian left. They seemed willing to go pretty far during COVID.
Spreading deadly disease to others is not a right, it is an attack on the freedoms and health of others.
Yes well, there is always a way to justify actions you support and condemn those that you don’t support. The only way to avoid an authoritarian regime of one kind or the other is to hold certain rights to be inviolable and above the scope of government. If you give the government power to remove your rights under certain circumstances then they will create those circumstances in order to use that power. Come on, you know this. And even if was for a cause you support this time, next time it might not be.
Nope, getting vaccinated so you don’t kill others is not to do with your rights. A million Americans died because of right-wing reality denial and disinformation. That was the actual massive betrayal of other people’s rights.
A million? How did you get that number? How many died directly as a result of covid? (Estimated 1.2 million total, depending on your source) And how many of them actually could have been prevented if everyone got vaccinated as soon as they could have? How many died from covid despite being vaccinated? It’s not like it was available or even as effective as everyone initially hoped. It actually blows my mind that everyone forgot how evil and influential the pharmaceutical industry is, the lengths they would go to, how absolutely filthy rich they got. I remember for decades they got in trouble for fudging efficacy data or even straight up fabricating, bribing politicians and doctors, and now years later we still got people like you going to bat for them. White knighting for big pharma… what a world.
I tried finding numbers on how many could have been saved if everyone got vaccinated who could have been, but they vary wildly depending on assumptions. Most of the answers to my questions above can’t even be found because nobody did the math besides sources you would diregard anyway. Boy do I ever wish we could have an honest conversation about it instead of political partisanship coloring everything about it.
“the US” is not a single entity with hopes and desires
Obviously.