Just checked the wikipedia page today and it says that it’s “Unsupported”.

When did that happened, isn’t it currently the most used Android version?

  • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When did that happened?

    Looks like 4 months ago. https://endoflife.date/android

    Isn’t it currently the most used Android version?

    According to this source, as of Jan 23, no. 10 is at 18.01%, which is beat by both 11 (23.15%) and 12 (25.29%). This is why you buy a phone with good support, and update your OS. They can’t support everything forever. Progress happens, security changes, and they can’t always backport the fixes, which also takes their talent away from evolving the OS. https://www.statista.com/statistics/921152/mobile-android-version-share-worldwide/

    Personally, I get Pixels and install GrapheneOS. They get 5 years of support.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t miss Android Auto as I never used it on stock, but I get others do. I miss Google Wallet’s tap-and-pay on the off chance I forget my wallet or not wanting to pull it out, but that’s a convenience thing and it’s not hard to pay with a physical card instead. That’s really it for me, to be honest.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      5 years of official support, typically custom ROMs keep it alive even longer, basically until it’s too hard to keep fixing broken features.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They could keep it alive past five years if they really wanted, but that goes against the goal of the project: namely security. But five years is already longer than most manufacturers do, so it’s nothing to turn your nose up at.

        “GrapheneOS aims to provide reasonably private and secure devices. It cannot do that once device support code like firmware, kernel and vendor code is no longer actively maintained. Even if the community was prepared to take over maintenance of the open source code and to replace the rest, firmware would present a major issue, and the community has never been active or interested enough in device support to consider attempting this. Unlike many other platforms, GrapheneOS has a much higher minimum standard than simply having devices fully functional, as they also need to provide the expected level of security.”

        https://grapheneos.org/faq#legacy-devices