What opinion just makes you look like you aged 30 years

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt you’ll find anyone here that disagrees with you. I was going to get an older pixel but I got a 6 instead and I’m still grieving the loss of my headphone jack.

        • OptimsticDolphin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But then you can’t charge at the same time, no good if you want to plug your phone into some speakers and charge it at the same time

            • dwindling7373@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My take: cables are a sustainable, effective and ELEGANT solution. Most wireless solutions fall under the definition of over-engineering.

              Cable: a properly lengthened cheap rope that magically transfers information, power and anchor stuff together.

              Wireless: two antenna, encoding of all kind, radiations, BATTERIES, higher chance to lose stuff, degrading of quality (Bluetooth).

  • The Baldness@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not subscribing to anything. If I buy something, it’s fully functional, and it’s mine. There is no ongoing relationship between me and the manufacturer. Done.

    • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anything that doesn’t incur an ongoing cost to provide should be legally prohibited from being sold as a “subscription.”

        • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except more and more companies are hopping on this gravy train because they can get away with it. At some point (and that point may be now already, depending on the sector), it’s going to be difficult-to-impossible to buy anything without this subscription bullshit.

    • Mackie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m working on this, the subscription model has gotten so expensive now that literally everything uses it. Do you have any tips besides “just pirate everything”?

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately the only alternative for some things are becoming very tech literate and running an objectively worse mediocre open source software

        • zettajon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is what I’m resorting to. Instead of pirating Lightroom, I’m using RawTherapee for my (non-professional) photo editing of my x100t photos. In the old days, I’d have done it (I still have a very old version of LR exe in one of my hard drives) but today I’d rather not have a ton of keygens and crap on my laptop.

  • Elbullazul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cars shouldn’t be loaded with user-facing technology. Bring back analog dashboards and buttons for climate control!

      • rolaulten@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting fact: I just got a new ev (so a battery hooked up to a computer with wheels) - and it has buttons! It also has dials for sound and climate.

        Now to be fair it also takes interacting with a touchscreen to turn on the heated seats, but I’d say it’s progress in the right direction.

    • StringTheory@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bring back stick-shift, too. People shouldn’t be driving if they have no grasp of the mass and inertia of their car. We should be able to disengage the engine at will. And we should have to pay attention when we drive.

  • Shrek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Music in restaurants and bars is just too loud. I know why the music is loud, but I am still going to shake my fist at it like Grandpa Simpson.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. It’s getting worse over time too, I can hardly hear anything anyone is saying in restaurants and bars anymore.

      I felt my inner boomer grow stronger after writing that.

  • Npenplz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Smart tech in general is annoying and dumb. I want my TV to just be a tv with inputs, I don’t need built in firmware and updates to shove ads in my face. I don’t want my car to have a touch screen to adjust the A/C, just give me a knob or buttons.

    • pumpsnabben@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can still buy things with very long lifetime but they are very expensive, the results of making cheaper things that break earlier is that more people can afford to buy them.

      This is of course what most companies want but is also makes a lot of products available to people who couldn’t afford them earlier which for many is a good thing.

      I think it’s a fair trade.

      • Mr_Grumpy@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many of the younger generations seem to accept that things don’t last/break easily. I come from a time where there was a wiring diagram for the TV pasted on the inside back cover. Washing machines and other devices often had the schematics included. Repairing your stuff and keeping it running was the norm back then. Even if you couldn’t, you probably had a neighbour who could. Planned obsolescence is a relatively new thing.

      • emerty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Things used to be made like this. Only boomers are old enough to remember buying an iron for life.

  • Glokosame@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t want to have a subscription for everything. It used to be possible to pay a one-time fee for software and use it as long as I want. Now I have to pay a monthly fee and once I finish paying, I can’t use the software anymore. And it’s not like I constantly get updates for the software. Often it stays the same for months or years.

    I understand that software has a price, but no way these prices are sometimes justified…

    • gzrrt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been voting with my wallet on this one for years- no headphone jack, no purchase

      • orbit@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s becoming super difficult now to be honest. I think I’m about to bite the bullet this weekend and just get a usb-c to 3.5mm adapter although it pains me deeply.

        What phone do you use??? I’m looking at the S23 at the moment but I’m still on an S8 lol

        • gzrrt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m on a Sony Xperia 10 IV now. Amazing battery life, decent for one-handed use, has a headphone jack, SD slot, and meh camera. Mostly solid overall- agree the situation’s getting worse and worse every year

          • erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I remember switching to Android because you could replace the battery and expand storage, and those were huge selling points. But now my phone has none of those things. Although I guess a lot of stuff is in the cloud.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Algorithms that try to suggest me content are universally bad, and all searches should provide results based solely on the terms, syntax, and language entered. Same with anything that tries to provide me content based on data harvested about my location or demographic.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to be mad at algorythms suggesting things that is disliked. But then I realised that it would be rather scary if they were right.

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it has its place but it should absolutely be optional. Yeah they suck but the YouTube algorithm is responsible for like 70% of my knowledge base.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I miss accidentally finding the most random stuff on YouTube way back before they started pushing monetized content, but it’s been a very long time

    • TauZero@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never have I ever benefited from Google or Amazon or anyone changing my search string for me. Even if I do misspell something, I’m gonna click on the “did you mean x instead?” link myself, because I don’t trust the 50/50 mixed results anyway. But 90% of the time I’m gonna be immediately scrambling to put the double quotes back in, which it’s also gonna ignore half the time.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hard agree. Sometimes I’m searching for something very specific and esoteric, and the results spam me with unrelated nonsense because the search engine thinks it knows better than I do

    • dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some alternative frontends resolve this. Invidious for example is a youtube front end. There are public instances. Most popular sites have them.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes! I’ve started using Invidious more and more when I’m on PC, but there are also addons that make YouTube itself more tolerable.

        I’ve been using LibreTube on my Android phone, and it’s so much better.

        • dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah.

          Invidious is pretty good in android Firefox like when you “add to homescreen”. The other browser add-ons won’t avoid the algorithm I think?

          I use newpipe. I found libretube seemed to stop working more than newpipe but maybe time for another look!

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was actually using newpipe + sponsorblock before switching to Libretube. There’s only been once that I’ve had to manually switch the piped instance so far, but I just prefer Libretube’s UI. Newpipe worked great, too. Both very good apps. You can’t go wrong with either imo

    • Leigh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like that Lemmy and Masto don’t have those fucking algorithms. It’s a relief.

      • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is your opinion on Bluesky? Their default feed is chronological, but they do have algorithms. They’re actually moving towards custom algorithms, so you can build your own or use someone else’s, delete, pin, reorder them. It’s like different feeds. I like that implementation personally.

        • Leigh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I couldn’t say, they’re closed to new users. I’ve been on the wait list for a long time, but no joy.

          I’m skeptical that it ultimately won’t just turn into Twitter 2.0

          • StoicLime@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually, the waitlist takes way too much time. I just went on Twitter and found a couple of people with invites. I don’t have one yet, but would you want one when I do?

            • Leigh@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, I’ll give it a go, thank you for thinking of me. The whole bullshit with Twitter and now Reddit has me feeling pretty burned on corporate-owned social media, so I’m likely to stick with federated things like Masto, Lemmy, etc., but I’ll give it a go. I am curious about it. I wonder why they’re leaning so hard on the waitlist thing? They’re losing precious adoption time, as people are right now wanting to move away from Twitter. Or rather, they have been wanting that for months, so there may already be a lot of lost opportunity re: user attention or interest.

  • Deestan@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    When contacting government or a service provider I want to call and talk to a human, dammit.

    • SmugBedBug@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like this could go either way whether it’s a boomer opinion or not. Real boomers are not very tech literate and probably don’t have much of a notion of online privacy.

      On the other hand for those that were adults in the early years of the internet, they likely think we’re all giving away too much of our private information.

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Boomers (my parents’ generation) were telling us 90’s kids how dangerous it was to put your information online, but then it seemed once social media happened they all forgot about such privacy concerns entirely. They were right the first time!

  • raresbears@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Phone bad.

    Like they’re objectively pretty useful but I find the experience of using one to just kinda suck and I avoid it as much as I can. I’d much much rather use a laptop or ideally my desktop if that’s at all possible. No idea how some people manage so much time using their phones

  • honk@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think this is a boomer opinion but I got called a boomer for it once so maybe it is idk:

    I think online dating is shit and I don’t mean it in a “It doesn’t work for me” kinda way but I believe it’s objectively shit. In an ever faster world that demands more and more flexibility from people that also extends to dating. It introduces a certain arbitrariness to romantic and sexual relationships. We now have dating apps that you can use to scroll through potential partners like a furniture catalog. It reduces people to a commodity and I hate being confronted with that. I believe it could in combination with the realities of late stage combination harm our ability to establish deep and meaningful connections to people.

    It’s literally what my mom warned me off 20 years ago and now I believe she was right.