• boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We, left-wingers, like Lula.

    Right wingers aren’t liberal and never will be, even though they’ve tried to steal that term many many times. From leaders like Lula actually. I’m pretty sure he can read.

    It is funny that tankies are like reactionary right wingers, just pretending not to be

    (or maybe think they aren’t 🤔)

    • The_Infinite_Monkey@lemdit.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Liberalism, being inextricably intertwined with capitalism, is a right-wing ideology. Tankies are often on the wrong side of the issue, but that’s because, like fascists and conservatives, they are reactionaries. Tankies take the side of certain established powers because those powers advertise themselves as resistance to liberal capitalism, without realizing or caring that fascists are manipulating their support. Actual leftists care first and foremost about harm reduction.

      • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Capitalism is inherently authoritarian and hierarchical, thus the antithesis of liberal.

        The term has seen hijack attempts with economic “liberalism” and neo-“liberalism”.

        Otherwise on point. Thank you for the excellent addition.

        • The_Infinite_Monkey@lemdit.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Liberalism generated the concept of ‘laissez-faire’, which is the basis of modern capitalist thought. While liberal philosophy is greatly concerned with the concept of rights, it is not at all concerned with the concepts of equity or moderation, both of which must be addressed in order to challenge capitalism. You seem to have a misinformed view of what the ideology entails.

          • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No I do not. I just give more value to it’s essence and not the bastardizations it has been tried to associate with to benefit the power structures.

              • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That was already debunked.

                Capitalism is a separate concept, trying to abuse liberalism. Free markets, economic “liberalism” are just marketing, leading to inverse effects, limiting/stifling/lessening freedom/liberty/liberalism.

                There is no liberty or equality as they are known in liberalism under the hierarchy of capital. Poor people aren’t at liberty or free. Not even high income workers. Only those who own the lower classes have the power to be free.

                • The_Infinite_Monkey@lemdit.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Hasn’t been debunked by you or anybody, because it is true. Liberalism is what liberals say it is, and liberals say capitalism is liberalism. Really doesn’t matter what you think.