• gbin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What I understand from the context is that it was a spying device but they jammed the hell out of it while flying over the US then took it down.

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s my point. The original poster is trying to draw a line between statements that the balloon was a spying device and later statements that it did not collect intelligence while it transited over US territory as evidence that it wasn’t a spying device and that the former of those statements is therefore inherently a lie. My take, without assessing the truthfulness of the claims, is that the linked articles do not support such a conclusion. One can claim the device was for spying and that it also didn’t collect intelligence without contradiction because the claim is that it failed to collect intelligence, not that it did not intend to do so in the first place.