It is battle tested, standardized, widely used, have open source servers and apps, end-to-end encryption (OMEMO), self-hostable and are low on ressources and federated / decentralized.

I use it with family and friends. Conversations and blabber.im on android and Gajim on Linux. There’s also apps for windows and Apple.

Curious if anyone here use it and why, why not?

EDIT: Doh. In these Lemmy times I forgot federated. Added.

  • BrikoX@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s great, problem is adoption with non tech people. You clearly had better luck with your friends and family than most. It’s hard enough to get them to use something as standard as Signal.

    • privsecfoss@feddit.dkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agree it’s easier to get techies on board. With normal people it is kind of a struggle competing and argumenting against the likes of WhatsApp, FB messenger and such. But I totally think it’s worth it because privacy.

    • Chobbes@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I host my own XMPP server and I like it (super lightweight and easy to set up), but good god the people that work on XMPP stuff seem to not want it to take off at all. They all complain that everybody is using matrix for some mysterious reason and when you explain that you can’t in good conscience get your friends to switch to it because there aren’t really great iOS apps it’s just a hissy fit about how people should use android instead… which is just not very realistic. Really wish XMPP had a good cross platform client. The client situation is improving rapidly and OMEMO finally mostly works everywhere! But it’d be really nice if there was a consistent client between platforms.

      That all sounds really critical, but I really do like XMPP and I really hope it gets better and gains more traction again! We really need good federated chat again, ideally just associated with an email address or something… because the current chat ecosystem is a mess!

        • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My wife uses teams for work, it seems pretty nice, it has everything in place, like video meeting, meeting note, calendar, and everything seems very streamlined.

          Slack just don’t have anything. What is your complaint about teams, is it unstable or something?

          • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Buggy, uses a ton of resources, super weird UI. I’ve said no in job interviews to companies who use Teams as their main communication platform. Slack is “fine”, but much better than Teams. At least it works, especially from Linux.

            • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My wife’s company mainly use windows, and I have never tried it on my computers, so that is probably why I never heard much complain about it.

              I think for them, they just use teams and couple other software, nothing resources intensive, so the resource consumption is probably fine for them.

  • agrammatic@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    What I have to give to XMPP is that it’s one of the easiest federated services to self-host. Running Prosody is super simple.

    • Chobbes@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Prosody is amazing and I’m still astounded by how easy it is to get XMPP up and running. That’s great stuff!

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My colleagues and I had set up a nice self-hosted XMPP server which everyone could use to chat in-house without any of the traffic leaving our network. We had it end-to-end encrypted and it was quick and easy. Then management (with the support of a few employees who like hype) switched us to Slack. It wasn’t private, it wasn’t end-to-end encrypted, all our confidential messages went out to the internet, the boss could technically read anything we wrote, and many people didn’t like the UI. Once management got frustrated with Slack they switched us to Microsoft Teams. After using that for a year, I miss Slack. Teams is a bloated buggy mess with a UI designed to confuse and no privacy, and it also has all the disadvantages of Slack.

    A few of us have secretly switched to Matrix and Element. It’s good. Don’t tell management.

    • zekiz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of a company I recently got an job interview to (and got declined, but I would’ve declined anyway).

      They were switching around their software every year and are currently in the process of migrating to Teams

    • kalipike@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      @floofloof I would love to move to Matrix/Element but don’t know a single person who uses it, so it doesn’t seem like it would much benefit me unfortunately. I do still have an account though.

      @privsecfoss

      • Scott@lem.free.as
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Install some bridges. I’ve managed to remove all those third party chat apps from my devices and just use Matrix to chat to everyone whether they’re on Slack, Discord, WhatsApp, IRC, etc.

        • dwindling7373@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can hyou point me on some good material to learn about them? I’ve been reading about those for years but never crossed a guide…

    • Widget@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      the boss could technically read anything we wrote

      My old work actually ran into some issues because they couldn’t see DMs/private channels.

      Maybe this is a cloud vs. self-hosted thing? It’s been a few years since I’ve worked there though.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In an average workplace that seems like a bit of a losing battle to fight since everyone can message each other on personal phones anyway. But I can see it if it’s a workplace that handles sensitive information and restricts the use of personal devices.

        My workplace went remote-only. So they don’t really stand a chance of preventing us messaging each other on our personal devices. I do try to keep the work machine separate though.

    • moon_matter@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      the boss could technically read anything we wrote

      That’s honestly a very reasonable ask. Employees should have no expectation of privacy while using corporate owned machines on a corporate owned network. They need to be able to keep tabs on communications in order to ensure company data doesn’t leak. It would be crazy to allow people to handle sensitive company data with no oversight.

  • jlarex@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    We had an XMPP server at work but 90% of people wouldn’t bother using it. As much as I dislike Teams it the only client that’s ever been deployed in my company that everyone actually uses.

  • Björn Tantau@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had my own server and used it for a long time until Android decided that it knows better what background services I want to have running and thus killed the “instant” part of instant messaging.

    Since then I’m on Signal and could at least convince most of my friends and family to move there.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Irc is underrated. Its my example for people getting upset communities are moving to forums instead of the fediverse sometimes because its old that old does not mean outdated.

      And don’t get me wrong, I really like this communication model, but I would never suggest it for a major software project community. I need things to be fully baked for official adoption. Part of my interest in contributing here is getting us enough critical mass that threadiverse development gets to that fully baked point

  • leetnewb@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use it for OMEMO encrypted family messaging and image transfer (snikket). Very fast messaging, lightweight server, and the A/V works quite well. Biggest issue, imo, is the lack of a great iOS client - not a judgement on the developers, I think that’s just the reality of developing on iOS. But an iOS client that works as seamlessly as Conversations would go a long way to regaining lost traction.

    • Chobbes@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what I’ve been saying for years. Siskin is pretty good these days, but it’s still not perfect (push notifications with OMEMO have no content). It’s really hard to recommend XMPP to people when the iOS experience is kind of bad (with omemo, anyway).

      • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I cannot recommend Siskin, as those in my life that have tried it have always experienced random issues. I find Monal to be a better experience in every way, except for the lack of calling support with Conversations.

        • Chobbes@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Monal is okay. It chews up battery and recently did some heinous crimes with group chat notifications so I’ve switched to Siskin. Either way… Neither app is perfect. Xmpp is decent on iOS now, but still a little lacking.

  • itchy_lizard@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like XMPP and OTR is nice, but we need double-ratchet for secure communications and sync with multiple devices.

    • leetnewb@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Omemo is double ratchet and my messages sync to multiple devices. New device can’t read old messages sent before exchanging keys with the other clients.

  • The Doctor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use it for pretty much all of my stuff, both as a message bus as well as a command-and-control mechanism for my bots.

    • leetnewb@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would like to hear more about what you’re doing / how you have it set up. I’ve used xmpp to relay messages from home automation stuff - which usually involves piping something to a script calling a library.

      • The Doctor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wrote an XMPP-to-REST bridge, one-to-N. Everything gets its own rail and message queue on the bridge so as long as something can make HTTP requests, it can send messages and receive them. Huginn agents, any of my bots (written in Python), even shell scripts. Just about everything I have that crunches numbers has at least one of those bridges and a population of bots running on it.

        There’s nothing wrong with command line chains, I have a really cut down version of System Bot re-implemented as a shell script (developed under Busybox’s default shell) for my OpenWRT stuff.

  • davefischer@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I lost my cell modem due to the 3g shutdown, I switched to xmpp for home automation for a while. I should probably set that up again…

  • zorrothefox2001@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    IIRC Google Talk using XMPP and most major messengers having GTalk integration, they pretty much accidentally federated several messenger apps

      • Chobbes@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I still cannot believe the Google I/O where they killed Talk and said “we’re consolidating all of the Google chat applications into hangouts. There will only be hangouts” and then the very next Google I/O they announced TWO new chat applications (allo and duo), whose purpose I never understood, and then every year since they’re like “everything is Google meet now… no, not that Google meet, the other Google meet” and I have absolutely no idea what’s going on and nothing makes me feel so old and out of touch like trying to follow Google’s chat ecosystem.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They took out XMPP years ago. I had a lot of hope for the future when they first federated. Even ran my own server and was able to talk to Google Talk users. Alas…

    • fouc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I doubt it was accidental, that’s standard tech corp playbook. Build on established technology or open standard, then shut the gates when critical mass has been achieved.