Goodmorning, I have used for a lot of time Firefox. In the privacy settings I can change tracking protection preferences to normal, custom and strict protection. Actually I’m using Librewolf, but I can’t see that option. What I liked of that option is that switching to custom I’m able to block all third part cookies. Librewolf doesn’t block third part cookies by default. For example, when I log for work with Google and I enter in a page that uses the google session cookie, I can see in the bar that I’m accepting that third part cookie. Of course I can remove it, but when I close the browser and I open it again I’ll get the same problem. So is there any way to block all third part cookies in Librewolf? I understand that due privacy reasons the tracking protection is set to strict by default, but why tou didn’t put an option to block all 3rd part cookies? Anyway, sorry for my English, I’m still learning it, I wish the question is clear.
I was looking in the librewolf FAQ and I have fond that:
In LibreWolf we decided to enable Enhanced Tracking Protection, as it plays nicely with uBO and it can block some extra scripts. (…) Finally, there’s no point in changing from strict to any other mode, as strict mode doesn’t usually cause any kind of breakage, and changing to custom mode to block cookies will come at the expense of disabling partitioning: not worth it, so we decided to hide the UI that allows users to change this setting. You can instead whitelist specific websites from the urlbar.
The FAQ redirects then to this comment on codeberg:
(…)users who change to other modes, do that for two main reasons, according mostly to reddit posts:
-they read strict so they think that if something is broken they need to change that. in my experience it never turned out to be true.
-they switch to custom to block third party cookies, which disables isolation making all the rest of the privacy measures useless, because lowest hanging fruit. even if they use FPI what they are getting is outdated code and more breakage, not good. (…)
Apparently disabling 3rd part cookies brakes the isolation, so they have decided to remove that option. I think that this is the best solution they were able to implement, but i have some perplexities. I wish they will solve this problem in the future. Of course, if anyone can clarify that point we’ll appreciate it ;-)
I’m interested in the answer as well!
Since I’m here and you’re concerned about your English, I’ll offer you this: replace “actually” by “currently”. It’s a faux-ami, actually means more “in reality” contrary to roman languages like French
Thank you, I really appreciate it :-)
Personally, I’m using uMatrix which is configured to block all 3rd party domains from loading /running code on my machine. Note that it’s a bit of a hassle at first to set it up.
Wow! I thought this was already the case. I’m also interested in the answer.
