• BolexForSoup@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    FO4 got a little flack, but overall it was very well received. You can see the reviews for yourself. Most of them are pretty high.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was on the lower end of favorable, lots of 8s about 10% of professionals being mixed. That’s not well received. Steam was about 75% positive, that’s not glowing reviews. It’s a good, but not great game. That’s great for a random indie title or a yearly release, but for once a decade franchise title, it’s not good.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        • IGN: 9.5
        • PC Gamer: 88
        • Metacritic: 87 critical, 6.8 User (game was very divisive for the old fans in particular so that’s not unusual IMO. You can see reviews swing wildly there with sub-5’s and 9-10 both all over the place)
        • Steam: is not 75%. I am not sure where you’re going that. It’s 83% all time, 89% recent, which I find very interesting actually.

        You’re welcome to throw out all of the above if you don’t like the sites for whatever reason, but if you could show 3-4 other examples from sites you’d consider valid if you take with issue the above I’d appreciate it. They were the top hits and all are major-known sites, that’s about it. I just don’t want to get bogged down in a source argument.