• Tathas@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is pretty normal behavior in response to any game published by an AAA studio.

      Intel is trying to break into the home GPU market, and you’re surprised that they’re trying to make sure a game that has a lot of interest is able to be run on their GPU?

      People who buy or recommend GPUs expect to be able to use them to run any software that relies upon a GPU. It’s already a bad look for Intel that this is a problem. The article says you can’t even launch the game at the moment.

      Imagine if Word or Excel or Chrome failed to launch because of the GPU you had installed?

        • steakmeoutt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re surprised that companies released updated graphics drivers to coincide with a tent pole release?

          No offence but are you new to PC gaming?

        • OskarAxolotl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They always do. The main reason graphics drivers are so fucking huge is that they contain tons of game specific patches. Nvidia has what they call “game-ready” updates which are supposed to increase performance of popular games or patch specific bugs.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why? They do that pretty much with every major release, especially for demanding titles. People tend to build PCs specifically for a specific game, so the major GPU vendors want to fill that high end need.

    • spamfajitas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      In terms of looks, I will say the rocky textures are pretty nice. Also they managed to map actors faces without getting that weird bugeye effect so many other games suffer from.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The character models seemed pretty simple for such a demanding game. I was hoping at least major characters would be a little more detailed. Then again, this was from watching a stream on my phone, so maybe it looks better in person.

        Aside from looks, the voice acting I saw seemed a little odd. It could also just be a poor script, but it just didn’t seem all that great.

        But overall, the game seemed pretty good, but not something I’m dying to run out and buy. I’ll have some more time this fall, so I’ll probably wait for a few patches to land.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is pretty common. A graphic card company bragging it can now run X game. Cyberpunk did this. Doom eternal. Hell, I remember when Dishonored 2 from a few years ago was the highlight.