• SocialEngineer56@notdigg.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. The original comment said the “worst disaster made a very small she’s of the planet uninhabitable”. Keep in mind this disaster was the result of Soviet incompetence and completely avoidable with standards implemented in the US.

    They’re saying our “worst case scenario” using nuclear power is better than worst case scenario continuing to use fossil fuels.

    Likelihood of worse case scenario using nuclear power is also extremely low. Whereas worst case scenario (billions of people dying) for continuing to use fossil fuels is EXTREMELY HIGH.