• gowan@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    No it isn’t a red herring. You claimed vegetarian diets are more expensive and that is not true on any level in any country that does not heavily subsidize meat (and even most that do).

    You are trying and failing to come up with reasons why you can ignore my claims and there is no logical basis for you to do so because they are true

      • gowan@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “many people still cannot afford it, no matter how your arrange the facts.”

        When you said that. It’s like your dodge where you talk about the time which billions of people seem to manage.

        The fact is you are not willing to make the change and that is perfectly fine. No one is saying you have to.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fact is you are not willing to make the change

          i don’t see why you want to make this personal: i’m talking about bare facts.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          billions of people

          i’m not talking about billions of people. i’m saying you can’t say whether any particular person can be vegan.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          your dodge where you talk about the time

          it’s not a “dodge”. it’s literally the basis on which i object to your assertion that everyone can be vegan.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              it was a clear implication of the comment to which i initially responded, and you’re splitting hairs now to back away from your position.