Should put this whole issue to rest (for a while, at least 😉).

  • Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    PS5 outsold both versions combined by around 2x. I don’t think it was nearly that big of a deal.

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      And do you think that would have panned out better if the cheaper console option wasn’t available? Not to mention it would only leave them with the console that shared a lot of the same components as the PS5 during supply shortages as well.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Microsoft should really ask themselves why they couldn’t have procured more components, despite being one of the most profitable companies on Earth.

        • ampersandrew@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, unless their goal is to lose even more money on each console sold, I doubt they were interested in that. But that’s not their goal. Their goal is to get people subscribed to Game Pass.

          • any1there@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, thank you!
            Microsoft has historically never been profitably selling consoles, which is certainly part of their shift towards different business models, including Game Pass and a focus on more than just Xbox, but PC and Cloud as well. They don’t really have much of a financial incentive to sell consoles for that sake alone, they have to get people to subscribe to Game Pass and/or buy games (possibly digitally whenever possible) and the Series S is their best console for that, as the consumer is very much locked in.

            • ampersandrew@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Game Pass does include PC gamers, which is why they’re probably more interested in opening up that service to more people with a cheap console SKU than to sell Xbox consoles, likely because outselling Sony by doing the same thing Sony is doing is a very steep hill to climb.

              • Hypx@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Then why even bother with a console? Just define the minimally specced PC box needed for Game Pass and call it a day.

                • ampersandrew@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  One day they might. PC has taken a larger and larger market share as time has gone on. PCs became easier to game on, consoles became less streamlined, and perhaps even the closed-off nature of consoles compared to the open nature of PCs has played a role. But as of 2023, you’re still not making a $300 PC that plays games as well as an S. While consoles have become less streamlined, they’re still more streamlined than a PC.

                  • Hypx@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    We’ve already established that the $300 box is not viable for much longer. And since it sold around 1/3 the numbers of the PS5, it didn’t even work as advertised.