• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Their op ed section, yes. Their news and investigative articles, no. They are well-known for their factual reporting that tends to be free from bias.

    Most major media outlets have op ed sections. That really is not what people are talking about when they call a news source a neutral outlet.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The Economist mixes snarky comments and snippets of opinion into their coverage to a much greater extent than other media outlets. Their “opinion” pieces (leaders) are sometimes just a truncated version of the longer “news” article later in the issue.

      Not saying it’s a bad thing; they’re pretty open about it and that’s how they’ve always been.

      • splinter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        This is materially incorrect in multiple ways.

        1. The Economist’s reporting is widely recognized for its absence of bias.
        2. Leaders are not opinion pieces, they are brief overviews, hence why they seem like “truncated versions” of articles.
        3. The “snippets of opinion” to which you refer are reporting on public opinion. I thought that was obvious.
        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Leafing through the latest issue, here’s a random article:

          The Biden administration pursued a mistaken policy on LNG exports.

          This is not a leader, but in the news section. In the contents:

          Despite her reassuring tone, this was a sharp-elbowed effort to place an obstacle in the way of the incoming Trump administration… Mr Biden bowed to election-year pressure from the subset of environmentalists hostile to LNG… As for the claim that increasing American lng would help China, it is politically clever, playing as it does on anti-China sentiment in Washington, dc, but energetically dumb…

          Look, again, I’m not castigating The Economist here. They have a particular way to present news, and their readership knows it. But they definitely do not try to be “neutral” in the way other outlets do.