Apparently mozilla wants the right to get data from firefox users. But not like general information, they want to know what data you upload or download through firefox.

Without it, we couldn’t use information typed into Firefox, for example.

What the fuck? I use firefox because I want privacy!!! Not sharing my information with a company.

We need a license to allow us to make some of the basic functionality of Firefox possible. WHY DO YOU NEED MY DATA TO MAKE FIREFOX WORK???

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So wtf happened at Mozilla for this 180 degree course change? This literally goed against everything it was supposed to stand for

  • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Get ready for ads as well

    https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e#commitcomment-153095625

    They removed this:

    
                {
    
                    "@type": "Question",
    
                    "name": "Does Firefox sell your personal data?",
    
                    "acceptedAnswer": {
    
                        "@type": "Answer",
    
                        "text": "Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "
    
                    }
    
                },
    
    
  • RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    At a time when they could actually be pushing the Manifest issue and try to finally get a foothold, instead it feels like they have scattered rakes around the yard in the middle of the night and decided to go for a jog.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    i still like mozilla (and I donate to them monthly because i believe in the mission of an open internet) and, unlike most people, i don’t think this is a very big deal.

    however, i don’t want to put all my eggs in one basket so… are there any other ethical pro open internet evangelist groups i should start to follow or contribute to? preferably an ethical foundation that isn’t cryptofash or bigoted. i know there’s the eff but they’re not really focused on an open and free internet, they’re more privacy (nothing against them; i love them).

    bonus if they’re not hq’d in the us.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Besides the privacy issue, the TOU is ridiculous. They supply a tool (the browser) and you use it. It’s not a collaboration between you and them. You can use it whatever way you want.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 day ago

    Doing some digging, this is what has been added to the privacy notice:

    You have the option to use a third-party AI chatbot of your choice to help you with things like summarizing what you’re reading, writing and brainstorming ideas, subject to that provider’s terms of use and privacy notice.

    If you choose to enable a chatbot in the sidebar and/or through a shortcut, Mozilla does not have access to your conversations or the underlying content you input into the selected chatbot. We do collect technical and interaction data on how this feature is used to help improve Firefox, such as how often each third-party chatbot provider is chosen, how often suggested prompts are used, and the length of selected text.

    In other words, there will be opt-in LLM functionality that can be tied to third party providers. When you submit information to them… they have that data… the data falls under their privacy policies, not Mozilla’s.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        that’s effectively be a more low-level reskin of whatever browser engine your system bundles, which would be chromium’s on non-apple systems

        The DuckDuckGo browser and search engine have been free to use since day one. We make money from privacy-respecting ads, not by exploiting your data. When you search for “car” we show you a car ad — it’s that simple.

        i fw that tbh

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mozilla ai really isn’t that great stop getting caught in the wave. We don’t want another dogshit ai company we want a Foss promoting web browser

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    You might not be using functions that require data to work. Are you using the AI options? Image to text? Translation? Saving passwords? Using search suggestions? Then you don’t need to send any data.

    Like it or not, most browsers do most of those things now. FireFox is no exception.

    This seems like a lot of smoke and no fire to me.

    • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Even writing a post, you’re entering data through Firefox into the post box. We just don’t consider that data. It would be pretty quiet around here if you couldn’t do that…

  • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Well shoot if Firefox goes I guess we’re back to carrier pigeons and smoke signals.

    • rhabarba@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Or make NetSurf good enough? It’s mature (and lacking developers), Ladybird is not.

  • Vivendi@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Typical anti-firefox FUD. These are all quite normal things to have in policies for CYA reasons to offer features. bUt mUh dATa!! 1!1!1!1!11 fuck off and live in a mountain, or use a almost useless obscure browser like Netsurf (that can’t load 90% of the web)

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      so why weren’t they in there before? moz’s lawyers have obviously never thought they even need a policy before now, so what changed?

      • Vivendi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Because they’re going to offer optional AI integration in the browser

        Look, we are in the minority. Lemmy has like, what, some thousands of users at best. Most people want features like AI, and firefox has to offer them to gain users instead of bleeding like a stuck pig as they’re doing now

        And the sentiment against AI on lemmy absolutely sucks dick. I’m tempted to go back to Reddit because this place is luddite.ml at this point. People who’ve never spun up a local model on their GPU talk like they have trifecta PhD creds in comp sci

        • kipo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Do you think sucking dick is a bad thing?

        • pogmommy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Why the hell does my HTML renderer need a baked-in frontend for a privacy nightmare that requires I sign over rights for every keystroke even if I don’t use it? If Mozilla really wants to roll it out themselves, make it an extension available for download and tie your abysmal terms of use to that, don’t upend your entire reputation for the latest big tech trend.

          And the sentiment against AI on lemmy absolutely sucks dick. I’m tempted to go back to Reddit because this place is luddite.ml at this point. People who’ve never spun up a local model on their GPU talk like they have trifecta PhD creds in comp sci

          Oh poor you, how dare people appropriately respond to foil-plated shit being advertised to us as platinum decor. Stay away from glue on days you use your computer

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Most people want features like AI

          That’s just not true.

          as someone who runs local inference all the time, i think that centralized online models have no place anywhere near consumers. partly because the things they offer are trivial and offload critical skills, partly because they require insane amounts of energy, and partly because they are privacy nightmares. all things that are against moz’s stated mission. and yet here we are.

  • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Used FF forever, even though the birth and rise of Chrome.

    We’re done. The company I IT for therefore is also done. As are friends and family I sort computers for.

    The shit now stinks and must be taken out.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Reading through their privacy policy, it seems pretty normal stuff to me… Even ensuring that more data stays local than other browsers.

      This sounds like bad communication more than bad software.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This isn’t really even bad communication. This is idiots with a platform screaming FUD for attention.

    • rhabarba@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Used FF forever

      So you probably should remember the Mozilla FAQ entry that it’s “Firefox”, not “FireFox”; and that’s why they prefer “fx” because “FF” makes no sense. ;-p

  • Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    WHY DO YOU NEED MY DATA TO MAKE FIREFOX WORK???

    They don’t care about your actual data, they care about how Firefox is used. That’s an incredible important piece of information every developer needs to know.
    How else do you get to know, what’s working right and what doesn’t? How do you plan development for the next years if you don’t know what to develop?

    This is about throwing millions of $ at the right thing. If you miss you are fucked.